Optimal extended class naming convention?

Question

Which of the following naming conventions is most used/accepted, or which is most optimal for most projects? I'm having a hard time deciding.

Base class: \Model
Sub class: \Model\User

Base class: \Model\Model
Sub class: \Model\User

Base class: \Model\Base
sub class: \Model\User

So in other words, should I put the base class in the same namespace as the subclasses, and should I call it something constant like "base" or should it just have the same name as the namespace?

Some thoughts on namespacing: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/431911/namespace-rule-of-thumb — cbednarski, Jun 21 '10 at 07:39

score 3 · Answer 1 · answered Jun 21 '10 at 14:11

3

Honestly, I always put the base class in the same directory as the sub classes, inless the base class is intended as part of a multi-application framework, in which case it would go in a generic library library,

answered Jun 21 '10 at 14:11

Antony Gibbs

3,300
1
17
12

score 1 · Answer 2 · answered Jun 21 '10 at 16:16

Not sure how PHP handles namespaces/packages, but in other languages there are benefits to keeping things in the same packages. I'm thinking specifically, of the ability to use Java's default and protected access modifiers, or C++'s friend keyword. These might not be possible/as straightforward once you start separating abstracts into a different package from concretes.

score 0 · Answer 3 · answered Jun 21 '10 at 16:19

0

I like the Zend Framework naming convention. If it don't seems very easy at first, it's very maintainable.

http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/coding-standard.naming-conventions.html

answered Jun 21 '10 at 16:19

Brice Favre

1,511
1
15
34

Optimal extended class naming convention?

3 Answers3