I need to present some microscopy images side by side and ensure they are directly comparable by eye in a presentation. The pictures were all taken with the same exposures, gain et cetera so the underlying pixel values should be comparable.
However, the microscopy software has a nasty habit of saving the files with one of the colour channels saturated (for some reason), so I have to process the images for presentations.
Previously I'd been using a macro which processes through a folder and calls the scripting command
run("Enhance Contrast", "saturated=0.35");
But on reflection I don't think this is the proper command to call. I don't think it would produce images that are directly comparable, by eye, to each other.
I had thought that the command
run("Color Balance...");
resetMinAndMax();
would be best as it should show the full display range. But the display values shown on the histogram do vary depending on the image.
Is this appropriate for making directly comparable images or should I run a command like
setMinAndMax();
more appropriate. With 0 as minimum and an arbitrary figure as the maximum. This is driving me mad, as I keep on getting asked about whether my images are directly comparable but I simply don't know!