I have a hand coded sitemap which I know doesn't include every possible scenario of links that are available as I am working with a CMS (Joomla). I have just used an automated generator that created me a sitemap and I am wondering which would be better, the one I created or the automated one. The one I created is very precise but I am always having to update it by hand. I am working with Joomla 1.5 which is pretty outdated and doesn't update the sitemap with links that are created inside the articles. Any thoughts or suggestions? Thanks in advance.
Asked
Active
Viewed 47 times
0
-
I use a 3rd party application: http://xml-sitemaps.com – BradM Apr 16 '15 at 18:44
-
That is what I have used as well. But I noticed that it would not add everything and that is why I hand coded mine. – user3376481 Apr 16 '15 at 19:04
-
Is there anything in the robots.txt file that is blocking the crawl? – BradM Apr 16 '15 at 19:07
-
No, it is getting crawled. I am just wondering which sitemap is better. I have created two. One that is hand created and one that has been automated. I would love to know which of the two are better without having to go line by line through the whole sitemap. – user3376481 Apr 17 '15 at 13:29
1 Answers
0
You don't need to have all URLs and combinations in a sitemap. The crawlers will find the links in the articles themselves on the long term. So working with Joomla sitemap is good enough.

Jérôme Verstrynge
- 57,710
- 92
- 283
- 453