12

In PostgreSQL, I would like to store signed values -999.9 - 9999.9. Can I use numeric(5.1) for this?

Or what type should I use?

Erwin Brandstetter
  • 605,456
  • 145
  • 1,078
  • 1,228
Nyi Ma Lay Win Lae Aye
  • 6,250
  • 2
  • 13
  • 10
  • The precision of a postgresql numeric is the total number of significant digits, and the scale is the number of decimal places required. 9999.9 has 5 digits and 1 decimal place, so yes, `numeric(5.1)` will be OK. See [the documentation](http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-NUMERIC-DECIMAL) for details. – Simon MᶜKenzie Apr 01 '15 at 02:44
  • is numeric(5.1) OK for -999.9? – Nyi Ma Lay Win Lae Aye Apr 01 '15 at 02:49
  • 4
    Why don't you try and insert a negative value and see what happens? Anyway, `numeric` is part of the sql standard, and yes, it's signed. – Simon MᶜKenzie Apr 01 '15 at 02:55

1 Answers1

18

You can certainly use the arbitrary precision type numeric with a precision of 5 and a scale of 1, just like @Simon commented, but with comma(,) instead of a dot (.) in the type modifier:

SELECT numeric(5,1) '-999.9' AS nr_lower
     , numeric(5,1) '9999.9' AS nr_upper;

 nr_lower | nr_upper
----------+----------
   -999.9 |   9999.9

The minus sign and the dot in the string literal do not count against the allowed maximum of significant digits (precision).
If you don't need to restrict the length, just use numeric.
If you need to enforce minimum and maximum, add a check constraint:

CHECK (nr_column BETWEEN -999.9 AND 9999.9)

numeric stores your number exactly. If you don't need the absolute precision and tiny rounding errors are no problem, you might also use one of the floating point types double precision (float8) or real (float4).

Or, since you only allow a single fractional decimal digit, you can multiply by 10 and use integer, which would be the most efficient storage: 4 bytes, no rounding errors and fastest processing. Just use and document the number properly.

Details for numeric types in the manual.

Erwin Brandstetter
  • 605,456
  • 145
  • 1,078
  • 1,228