How might maven's buildNumber metadata become inconsistent across multiple build agents?

Question

We recently added a second build machine to our build environment and began experiencing very odd occasional build failures.

I have two separate Maven build machines, A and B, each running Maven 2.2.1 and communicating to a shared Nexus 1.5.0 repository manager. My problem is that builds on B will occasionally fail because it refuses to download a newer version of a common dependency 'acme-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT' previously built by A and uploaded to Nexus.

Looking inside the local repositories on both machines I noticed some oddities in the repository metadata.

Machine A's acme\1.0.0-SNAPSHOT\maven-metadata-nexus.xml:

<metadata>
  <groupId>acme</groupId>
  <artifactId>acme</artifactId>
  <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
  <versioning>
    <snapshot>
      <buildNumber>1</buildNumber>
    </snapshot>
    <lastUpdated>20100525173546</lastUpdated>
  </versioning>
</metadata>

Machine B's acme\1.0.0-SNAPSHOT\maven-metadata-nexus.xml:

<metadata>
  <groupId>acme</groupId>
  <artifactId>acme</artifactId>
  <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
  <versioning>
    <snapshot>
      <buildNumber>2</buildNumber>
    </snapshot>
    <lastUpdated>20100519232317</lastUpdated>
  </versioning>
</metadata>

In Nexus's acme/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml:

<metadata>
  <groupId>acme</groupId>
  <artifactId>acme</artifactId>
  <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
  <versioning />
</metadata>

If I'm interpreting the metadata files correctly (documentation online is scant), it appears machine B believes it has a newer version of the acme dependency (based on buildNumber) despite the fact that machine A last built it 6 days after machine B did (based on timestamp). Nexus also appears to be unaware of a universally correct buildNumber.

How could this situation possibly arise? What could I do to prevent my builds from failing due to inconsistent metadata? Have you experienced anything similar?

Important notes:

Both build machines have settings.xml files where the updatePolicy is "always".
Nexus does indeed have the newer version of acme that was built by A. B simply refuses to download it.
A and B are the only machines uploading to Nexus.
Both servers share the same system time.
All processes involved have write privileges to the metadata files so that they can be updated as necessary.
I was unable to find any open Maven or Nexus issues describing this behaviour.
Our CI server (Atlassian Bamboo) prevents builds of the same artifact from happening concurrently, so some race condition while uploading to Nexus is rather unlikely.

edit - Added Nexus's maven-metadata.xml file. – Brian Laframboise May 26 '10 at 20:31 — Brian Laframboise, May 26 '10 at 20:31

score 2 · Answer 1 · answered Jun 06 '10 at 01:54

2

It looks like you posted the wrong maven-metadata from Nexus, this looks like the one in the acme folder rather than the acme/1.0-SNAPSHOT folder. (it would have the build number and timestamp in there).

Anyway, have you tried adding -U to the maven build commands? It's possible that you've stumbled upon some maven bug respecting the always setting, but I'm sure -U works.

answered Jun 06 '10 at 01:54

Brian Fox

6,782
4
27
31

Thanks for your attention on my issue, Brian. I managed to track down the root cause which I explain in my answer. If there's something I'm missing, please let me know. – Brian Laframboise Jun 07 '10 at 15:50

score 2 · Accepted Answer · answered Jun 07 '10 at 15:47

It took me a while, but I tracked down the underlying issue to maven bug MNG-4142.

Here's what happened:

My acme-1.0-SNAPSHOT (build 1) was installed on A and uploaded to Nexus. The project was next built on B where the newly built acme-1.0-SNAPSHOT (build 2) was installed and uploaded to Nexus, overriding build 1.

Then, when a build happened on the A machine that had acme-1.0-SNAPSHOT as a dependency, MNG-4142 kicked in. The repository metadata contained "true" which prevented A from downloading the more recent build 2 of acme-1.0-SNAPSHOT, and so maven built my project against the older build 1 which caused build failures. This was still the case even when -U was used.

As I mentioned on the issue, I'm quite surprised at this behaviour and struggle to think of how other distributed build environments work in the presence of this bug. We currently have some cron jobs that frequently change the "localCopy" metadata to false in order to get what I believe should be the default, and correct, behaviour.

How might maven's buildNumber metadata become inconsistent across multiple build agents?

2 Answers2