0

I 'm despair. I am trying to install gitlab for 3 days without success on my RaspberryPi 2 with Debian. I was following this guide at the newest version of gitlab (7-8-stable). I also installed the newest ruby version 2.2.1. If I ran sudo -u git -H bundle exec rake gitlab:check RAILS_ENV=production all field are green so the installation should be correct. Here is my unicorn.stderr.log file after the gitlab start an after the first site calling. The only error in the production.log file is

PG::Error: ERROR:  database "gitlabhq_production" already exists
: CREATE DATABASE "gitlabhq_production" ENCODING = 'unicode'
PG::Error: ERROR:  database "gitlabhq_production" already exists
: CREATE DATABASE "gitlabhq_production" ENCODING = 'unicode'

and makes no sense for me. Here is the sidekiq.logfile. I already set the timeout in the unicorn.rb file to 360.

A possible trouble could be the domain setting. I test gitlab in my local network so in every config I let the localhost option.

EDIT:

I test gitlab with a static local network ip 192.168.1.x. Later I want to have access with the no-ip service and an domain like xx.no-ip.org. What should I write for

# Update GitLab config file, follow the directions at top of file
sudo -u git -H editor config/gitlab.yml

or in the nginx configuration. What is my fully qualified domain name?

I think the problem lies here:

E, [2015-03-08T12:36:19.560253 #2751] ERROR -- : reaped #<Process::Status: pid 2779 SIGABRT (signal 6)> worker=2
I, [2015-03-08T12:36:19.583573 #2878]  INFO -- : worker=2 ready

but I don't know how I can fix the problem.

Can someone please help me?

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Chryb
  • 547
  • 1
  • 12
  • 34

1 Answers1

-3

Finally I have it. This post was very helpful. Thanks for help! ... :/

Chryb
  • 547
  • 1
  • 12
  • 34
  • 1
    Linking to a now dead post really hasn't helped – H2ONOCK Sep 25 '18 at 15:13
  • @H2ONOCK I'm very sorry that I don't check every day if the link in my answer I wrote 3 years ago is still reachable... – Chryb Sep 26 '18 at 13:39
  • No need to apologise for that, maybe just write better answers that can be viewed in time to come rather than linking out? Thanks. – H2ONOCK Sep 26 '18 at 16:48