Simplifying a little, I'll assume you have some random timestamps in your dataset like this:
time price
--------------------------------------
2015.01.20D22:42:34.776607000 7
2015.01.20D22:42:34.886607000 3
2015.01.20D22:42:36.776607000 4
2015.01.20D22:42:37.776607000 8
2015.01.20D22:42:37.886607000 7
2015.01.20D22:42:39.776607000 9
2015.01.20D22:42:40.776607000 4
2015.01.20D22:42:41.776607000 9
so there are some missing seconds there. I'm going to call this table t
. So if you do a by-second type of query, obviously the seconds that are missing are still missing:
q)select max price by time.second from t
second | price
--------| -----
22:42:34| 7
22:42:36| 4
22:42:37| 8
22:42:39| 9
22:42:40| 4
22:42:41| 9
To get missing seconds, you have to join a list of nulls. In this case we know the data goes from 22:42:34 to 22:42:41, but in reality you'll have to find the min/max time and use that to create a temporary "null" table to join against:
q)([] second:22:42:34 + til 1+`int$22:42:41-22:42:34 ; price:(1+`int$22:42:41-22:42:34)#0N)
second price
--------------
22:42:34
22:42:35
22:42:36
22:42:37
22:42:38
22:42:39
22:42:40
22:42:41
Then left join:
q)([] second:22:42:34 + til 1+`int$22:42:41-22:42:34 ; price:(1+`int$22:42:41-22:42:34)#0N) lj select max price by time.second from t
second price
--------------
22:42:34 7
22:42:35
22:42:36 4
22:42:37 8
22:42:38
22:42:39 9
22:42:40 4
22:42:41 9
You can use fills
or whatever your favourite filling heuristic is after that.
q)fills `second xasc asc ([] second:22:42:34 + til 1+`int$22:42:41-22:42:34 ; price:(1+`int$22:42:41-22:42:34)#0N) lj select max price by time.second from t
second price
--------------
22:42:34 7
22:42:35 7
22:42:36 4
22:42:37 8
22:42:38 8
22:42:39 9
22:42:40 4
22:42:41 9
(Note the sort on second
before fills
!)
By the way for larger tables this will be much faster than a loop. Loops in q are generally a bad idea.
EDIT
You could use a comma join too, both tables need to be keyed on the second
column
t,t1
(where t1 is the null-filled table keyed on second
)
I haven't tested it, but I suspect it would be slightly faster than the lj
version.