1

I'm trying to pass some data as a block to some external API. It would be a hassle to accommodate it to accepting additional parameters. If it were javascript, I might make it like so:

var callback = function() {
    // do something
}
callback['__someData'] = options;
someExternalAPI(callback);

Is this possible with Ruby? Or how should I go about associating some data with a block?

Not sure if the edits to the question were correct. First, I'd like to specifically pass some data along with a block if that is possible. Not sure if it is though. And probably the only way to do it in ruby is to pass some data as a block.

Additionally, here might be some useful info.

Okay, it probably makes sense to show the whole picture. I'm trying to adapt webmock to my needs. I have a function, which checks if request's params (be them of POST, or of GET) match specified criteria:

def check_params params, options
  options.all? do |k,v|
    return true unless k.is_a? String
    case v
    when Hash
      return false unless params[k]
      int_methods = ['<', '<=', '>', '>=']
      v1 = int_methods.include?(v.first[0]) ? params[k].to_i : params[k]
      v2 = int_methods.include?(v.first[0]) \
        ? v.first[1].to_i : v.first[1].to_s
      v1.send(v.first[0], v2)
    when TrueClass, FalseClass
      v ^ ! params.key?(k)
    else
      params[k] == v.to_s
    end
  end
end

It's not perfect, but it suffices for my particular needs, for now. I'm calling it like this:

stub_request(:post, 'http://example.com/')
  .with { |request|
    check_params Rack::Utils.parse_query(request.body), options
  }

And the thing is generally I see no sensible way to output with block conditions. But in my particular case one can just output options hash. And instead of this:

registered request stubs:

stub_request(:post, "http://example.com")

to have this:

stub_request(:post, "http://example.com").
  with(block: {"year"=>2015})

Which is what I'm trying to do.

x-yuri
  • 16,722
  • 15
  • 114
  • 161
  • Nothing about your JavaScript example involves passing data along with that callback. I'm not sure why it's relevant. – user229044 Jan 10 '15 at 16:07
  • Indeed, I phrased it badly, I'd rather like to store the arguments the block was called with within the block itself. **UPD** Or not. – x-yuri Jan 10 '15 at 16:13
  • Would a lambda do what you want? – pjs Jan 10 '15 at 16:17
  • The way to associate data with functions in an object orientated language is with objects. – matt Jan 10 '15 at 16:42
  • @matt Doesn't my answer do just that? I must have added that what I'm trying to do is a workaround. – x-yuri Jan 10 '15 at 16:56
  • @x-yuri Your answer does pretty much that, but why do you need to use a `Proc`? The code that consumes it will need to know it isn’t just a Proc and that it has some extra data won’t it? In that case it would probably be better to explicitly create a class for the job. Or is the data just used by the Proc itself when it is called? – matt Jan 10 '15 at 17:01

1 Answers1

0

Okay, I ended up doing this:

p = Proc.new {}
p.class.module_eval { attr_accessor :__options }
p.__options = {a: 1}                                                                                
# ...
pp p.__options

Or to be more specific:

def mk_block_cond options, &block_cond
  options = options.select { |k,v| ! k.is_a?(Symbol) }
  return block_cond if options.empty?
  block_cond.class.module_eval { attr_accessor :__options }
  block_cond.__options = options
  block_cond
end

module WebMock
  class RequestPattern
    attr_reader :with_block
  end
end

module StubRequestSnippetExtensions
  def to_s(with_response = true)
    request_pattern = @request_stub.request_pattern
    string = "stub_request(:#{request_pattern.method_pattern.to_s},"
    string << " \"#{request_pattern.uri_pattern.to_s}\")"

    with = ""

    if (request_pattern.body_pattern)
      with << ":body => #{request_pattern.body_pattern.to_s}"
    end

    if (request_pattern.headers_pattern)
      with << ",\n       " unless with.empty?

      with << ":headers => #{request_pattern.headers_pattern.to_s}"
    end

    if request_pattern.with_block \
    && request_pattern.with_block.respond_to?('__options') \
    && request_pattern.with_block.__options
      with << ",\n       " unless with.empty?

      with << "block: #{request_pattern.with_block.__options}"
    end

    string << ".\n  with(#{with})" unless with.empty?
    if with_response
      string << ".\n  to_return(:status => 200, :body => \"\", :headers => {})"
    end
    string
  end
end

module WebMock
  class StubRequestSnippet
    prepend StubRequestSnippetExtensions
  end
end

module RequestPatternExtensions
  def to_s
    string = "#{@method_pattern.to_s.upcase}"
    string << " #{@uri_pattern.to_s}"
    string << " with body #{@body_pattern.to_s}" if @body_pattern
    string << " with headers #{@headers_pattern.to_s}" if @headers_pattern
    if @with_block
      if @with_block.respond_to?('__options') \
      && @with_block.__options
        string << " with block: %s" % @with_block.__options.inspect
      else
        string << " with given block"
      end
    end
    string
  end
end

module WebMock
  class RequestPattern
    prepend RequestPatternExtensions
  end
end

And now I stub requests this way:

stub_request(:post, 'http://example.com/')
  .with &mk_block_cond(options) { |request|
    check_params Rack::Utils.parse_query(request.body), options
  }

P.S. github issue

x-yuri
  • 16,722
  • 15
  • 114
  • 161