How to get number of groups in a groupby object in pandas?

Question

This would be useful so I know how many unique groups I have to perform calculations on. Thank you.

Suppose groupby object is called dfgroup.

Answer 1

Simple, Fast, and Pandaic: ngroups

Newer versions of the groupby API (pandas >= 0.23) provide this (undocumented) attribute which stores the number of groups in a GroupBy object.

# setup
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('aabbcccd')})
dfg = df.groupby('A')

# call `.ngroups` on the GroupBy object
dfg.ngroups
# 4

Note that this is different from GroupBy.groups which returns the actual groups themselves.

Why should I prefer this over len?

As noted in BrenBarn's answer, you could use len(dfg) to get the number of groups. But you shouldn't. Looking at the implementation of GroupBy.__len__ (which is what len() calls interally), we see that __len__ makes a call to GroupBy.groups, which returns a dictionary of grouped indices:

dfg.groups
{'a': Int64Index([0, 1], dtype='int64'),
 'b': Int64Index([2, 3], dtype='int64'),
 'c': Int64Index([4, 5, 6], dtype='int64'),
 'd': Int64Index([7], dtype='int64')}

Depending on the number of groups in your operation, generating the dictionary only to find its length is a wasteful step. ngroups on the other hand is a stored property that can be accessed in constant time.

This has been documented in GroupBy object attributes. The issue with len, however, is that for a GroupBy object with a lot of groups, this can take a lot longer

But what if I actually want the size of each group?

You're in luck. We have a function for that, it's called GroupBy.size. But please note that size counts NaNs as well. If you don't want NaNs counted, use GroupBy.count instead.

Answer 2

As documented, you can get the number of groups with len(dfgroup).