0

I got the source code for the latest Google.Apis, Google.Apis.Core and Google.Apis.Auth.dll (all 1.9.x.x) and compiled them with strong name. Now when I compile my code using the strong named dlls it gives an error:

The type 'Google.Apis.Services.BaseClientService.Initializer' is defined in an assembly that is not referenced. You must add a reference to assembly 'Google.Apis, Version=1.9.0.23042, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'

in the line: UserCredential credential = new UserCredential(flow, "me", token);

Everything works just fine without strong name. I need to add the strong name because my main program where this library is referred has strong name.

Any ideas?

Samuel
  • 1,949
  • 4
  • 18
  • 30
  • okay I got some clue, if I remove the code related to Google.Apis.Plus.v1 and Google.Apis.Calendar.v3 then the code compiles. Even though I add strong key to these dlls, they are causing some issue. Can someone tell me where to find the dotnet sources for these dll so that I can recompile the sources using strong key. I searched in google code repository, but they seemed to be generated using some tool. – Samuel Nov 01 '14 at 14:49
  • Update: The file Google.Apis.Calendar.v3.cs that I downloaded from code.google.com seems to be created for .net framework 2.0 and so it is old. Any ideas where google put the new files or how can we generate one? – Samuel Nov 01 '14 at 22:17

1 Answers1

1

The sources for Google APIs Calendar, Drive, Youtube and all are available at: https://google-api-client-libraries.appspot.com/download/library/[API_NAME]/[API_VERSION]/csharp.

For example to download the latest Calendar API source, use the following link - https://google-api-client-libraries.appspot.com/download/library/calendar/v3/csharp

peleyal
  • 3,472
  • 1
  • 14
  • 25
  • This is what I needed! I did decompile the libraries yesterday and could do the compilation with strong key again but having it from the source helps. I think giving a strong-key version of these libraries will also help, especially when it gives error if you sign the existing dlls. – Samuel Nov 02 '14 at 16:07
  • I have been looking for those links for a year or more. – Linda Lawton - DaImTo Nov 03 '14 at 11:40