Suppose we have a classes with method which is potentially very useful, but not available due protected scope:
unit Sealed;
interface
type
TGeneral = class(TObject)
{ this method is useful, but not available }
protected procedure Useful; virtual;
end;
TSpecific1 = class(TGeneral)
{ some descendants override `Useful` method }
protected procedure Useful; override;
end;
TSpecific2 = class(TGeneral)
{ and some dont, but inherit `Useful`ness from the parent }
end;
I know two old-school ways to reach out for such method, both are involving an inheritance and typecast. Both approaches should works the same with the basic case #1 and advanced polymorphic case #2.
program CallingSite;
uses Sealed;
function GetInstance: TGeneral;
begin
{ !PSEUDO! makes compiler happy about the rest of code }
// depending on use case supposed to return an instance of `TGeneral`
// or any of its descendants - `TSpecific1`, `TSpecific2`
end;
type
{ this makes a current module a "friend" for `TGeneral` }
TFriend = class(TGeneral)
end;
procedure Case1;
var
{ holds an instance of `TGeneral` }
General: TGeneral;
begin
General := GetInstance;
{ protected method is available for "friend" via static cast }
TFriend(General).Useful; // compiles!
end;
type
TIntroducer = class(TGeneral)
{ this "reintroduces" `Useful` method to public scope }
public procedure Useful; override;
// this approach ought to work even with strict protected methods
// !!! but I THINK it is UNSAFE to use on virtual and/or dynamic methods
end;
procedure TIntroducer.Useful;
begin
{ and calls `Useful` via wrapper }
inherited;
end;
procedure Case2;
var
{ polymorphic instance of any `TGeneral`'s descendant }
Specific: TGeneral;
begin
Specific := GetInstance;
{ protected method is callable via public wrapper, static cast again }
TIntroducer(Specific).Useful; // compiles!
end;
I'd like to know:
- how to achieve the same result applying the power of class helpers?
- is it possible to call a private method with class helper as well?
- will be any differences between case #1 and case #2 due the fact what class helper augments the class scope, not an internal representation?
- how to invoke an original method from the one reintroduced in class helper w/o risking a recursion?
Also, please comment on remark about TIntroducer
unsafety.