6

I want to list all users with their corropsonding user class. Here are simplified versions of my tables

CREATE TABLE users (
    user_id INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    user_class VARCHAR(100),
    PRIMARY KEY (user_id)
);
INSERT INTO users VALUES
    (1, '1'),
    (2, '2'),
    (3, '1,2');
CREATE TABLE classes (
    class_id INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    class_name VARCHAR(100),
    PRIMARY KEY (class_id)
);
INSERT INTO classes VALUES
    (1, 'Class 1'),
    (2, 'Class 2');

And this is the query statement I am trying to use but is only returning the first matching user class and not a concatenated list as hoped.

SELECT user_id, GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT class_name SEPARATOR ",") AS class_name
FROM users, classes
WHERE user_class IN (class_id)
GROUP BY user_id;

Actual Output

+---------+------------+
| user_id | class_name |
+---------+------------+
|       1 | Class 1    |
|       2 | Class 2    |
|       3 | Class 1    |
+---------+------------+

Wanted Output

+---------+---------------------+
| user_id | class_name          |
+---------+---------------------+
|       1 | Class 1             |
|       2 | Class 2             |
|       3 | Class 1, Class 2    |
+---------+---------------------+

Thanks in advance

zendar
  • 13,384
  • 14
  • 59
  • 75
bigstylee
  • 1,240
  • 1
  • 12
  • 22

2 Answers2

7

This is not the best design, but here's the query you want:

SELECT  user_id, GROUP_CONCAT(class_name)
FROM    users
JOIN    classes
ON      FIND_IN_SET(class_id, user_class)
GROUP BY
        user_id
Quassnoi
  • 413,100
  • 91
  • 616
  • 614
3

This breaks rules of database normalization. Don't store many-to-many values in a comma-separated list. Instead make another table user_classes with fields user_id and class_id. This table is simply used as a link table between the other two classes. After this you can use GROUP_CONCAT to do what you want.

reko_t
  • 55,302
  • 10
  • 87
  • 77