9

My curiousity for ember-cli has grown after learning about it at a recent emberjs meetup.

As far as i know, ember-cli grown out of ember-starter-kit. From there, ember-starter-kit was deprecated in favor of ember-cli recently.

I've used grunt/ yeoman for over 10 months now. I've grown favor towards it because of it's plugin ecosystem.

On the otherhand, what are some advantages of using Ember-cli vs grunt & yeoman? Or are there any advantages at all?

What can ember-cli achieve that grunt / yeoman can't?

chrisjlee
  • 21,691
  • 27
  • 82
  • 112

1 Answers1

10

Here are some major differences with ember-cli over grunt / yeoman:

  • Ember.js utilizes broccoli.js as it's pipeline.
  • Ember.js conventions are instantly baked in.
  • Tightly integrates with ember components: ember-data, handlebars, qunit testing, etc
  • Allows use of ES6 transpiler to compile ember.js. This makes code future friendly.
  • Ability for "rails-like" code generation of routes, controllers, etc.

Here are some advantages of grunt / yeoman over ember-cli

  • Grunt provides lots of pre-existing code and functionality. It is more mature than broccoli. Some plugins can be lacking in broccoli.
  • Yeoman allows the ability to create a while project as well with generators.

Source

chrisjlee
  • 21,691
  • 27
  • 82
  • 112