I need a generic based class that should work only for two primitive type. those types are not relevant to each other ( Not Implemented Not Extended each Other). is there any way?
-
Which version of haxe? Latest versions allows experimental Java support. – Unihedron Jul 23 '14 at 14:11
-
If there is no relationship between these types, then their intersection is empty, no? What is the point of such a restriction? Can you share some code to clarify? – back2dos Jul 23 '14 at 17:54
2 Answers
Agreeing with other comments and answers, without knowing what you're trying to achieve it's hard to know what the point is of accepting two unrelated types.
A couple of things I can think of:
1. If you never use the objects in a type specific way (for example, you only ever serialize it to JSON, which would work for any type) then you can use an abstract wrapping dynamic:
As an example, take a look at this Either
class from Andy Li's jQuery externs:
abstract Either<T1, T2>(Dynamic) from T1 from T2 to T1 to T2 {}
You could then call:
var arr:Array<Either<String,Int>>;
arr.push(0);
arr.push("hi");
var myInt = arr[0];
var myString:String = arr[1]; // you might need to use explicit type hints
This is basically an Array underneath the scenes, but it will only let you use a String or an Int.
2. If you're building you're own class, and just need to accept arguments of one type or another, you can just use optional function parameters:
function doSomething( ?myInt:Int, ?myString:String ) {
if ( myInt!=null ) trace('Int!');
else if ( myString!=null ) trace('String!');
}
3. If you want something like 1, but with stricter typing, you can use a more advanced abstract. At the risk of self promotion I wrote a blog post on this technique in detail, but I've pasted the basic code here:
class Test {
static function main(){
stringOrInt( "hello" );
stringOrInt( 10 );
}
static function stringOrInt( either:AcceptEither<String,Int> ) {
switch either.type {
case Left(str): trace("string: "+str);
case Right(int): trace("int: "+int);
}
}
}
abstract AcceptEither<A,B> (Either<A,B>) {
public inline function new( e:Either<A,B> ) this = e;
public var value(get,never):Dynamic;
public var type(get,never):Either<A,B>;
inline function get_value() switch this { case Left(v) | Right(v): return v; }
@:to inline function get_type() return this;
@:from static function fromA( v:A ):AcceptEither<A,B> return new AcceptEither( Left(v) );
@:from static function fromB( v:B ):AcceptEither<A,B> return new AcceptEither( Right(v) );
}
enum Either<A,B> {
Left( v:A );
Right( v:B );
}
You could use this like var arr:Array<AcceptEither<String,Int>> = []
with any generic class.

- 5,908
- 2
- 27
- 26
-
Thank you so much, i want to have a class (container for example) when we are instancing it should accept one of the two type (int or float). when i defined it int, it can not accept float and vice versa; i think eitherClass is not good idea. – J.J Jul 25 '14 at 11:43
-
@J.J then you should use the map approach I linked in the neighbour answer. Ask if you aren't getting how is it working(it's a bit cryptic if you aren't experienced with haxe). – stroncium Jul 27 '14 at 05:46
You might use the approach used in Map(haxe std lib). Here is the current source.

- 1,430
- 9
- 8