It's fairly straight-forward to add a TextField using ABCPDF:
public FormField AddTextField(string inRect, string inName, string inText)
{
int fieldId = mDoc.AddObject("<</Type /Annot /Subtype /Widget /F 4 /FT /Tx /Ff 4096 /Q 1>>");
mDoc.SetInfo(fieldId, "/V:Text", inText);
RegisterField(fieldId, inName, inRect);
return new FormField(fieldId, mDoc);
}
With this as the implementation:
FormField text = AddTextField("40 530 300 580", "TextField1", "Hello World!");
text.DefaultAppearance = "/TimesRoman 36 Tf 0 0 1 rg";
text.BorderColor = "0 0 0";
text.FillColor = "220 220 220";
text.TextAlign = "Left";
If I need to add two fields that have the same name, it's a little more complex:
public int AddGroupField(FormField[] inKids, string inName, string inValue)
{
if (inKids.Length == 0)
throw new Exception("Cannot have a group field with no kids");
string ft = null, dv = null;
int fieldId = mDoc.AddObject("<< /Kids [] >>");
foreach (FormField kid in inKids)
{
mDoc.SetInfo(fieldId, "/Kids[]:Ref", kid.Id.ToString());
mDoc.SetInfo(kid.Id, "/Parent:Ref", fieldId);
if (ft == null)
ft = mDoc.GetInfo(kid.Id, "/FT");
if (dv == null)
dv = mDoc.GetInfo(kid.Id, "/DV");
mDoc.SetInfo(kid.Id, "/FT:Del", "");
mDoc.SetInfo(kid.Id, "/V:Del", "");
mDoc.SetInfo(kid.Id, "/DV:Del", "");
}
mDoc.SetInfo(fieldId, "/FT", ft);
mDoc.SetInfo(fieldId, "/T:Text", inName);
mDoc.SetInfo(fieldId, "/V:Text", inValue);
if (dv != null)
mDoc.SetInfo(fieldId, "/DV:Text", dv);
int eid = mDoc.GetInfoInt(mDoc.Root, "/AcroForm:Ref");
mDoc.SetInfo(eid, "/Fields*[]:Ref", fieldId);
return fieldId;
}
With this as the implementation:
FormField[] kids = new FormField[2];
kids[0] = AddTextField("40 230 300 280", null, null);
kids[1] = AddTextField("40 170 300 220", null, null);
int id = AddGroupField(kids, "TextField1", "Hello World!");
However, I'm having issues with adding a TextField to a PDF where a TextField already exists with that same name. So, for example, if my PDF already has a field named "TextField1" and then I want to add another field with that same name, none of the above implementations will work.