I found inconsistency in Scala's underscore

Question

This works: (1 to 5).reduceLeft( _+_ )

but this doesn't: (x:Int,y:Int)=>_+_

<console>:8: error: missing parameter type for expanded function ((x$1, x$2) => x$1.$plus(x$2))
              (x:Int,y:Int)=>_+_
                             ^
<console>:8: error: missing parameter type for expanded function ((x$1: <error>, x$2) => x$1.$plus(x$2))
              (x:Int,y:Int)=>_+_
                               ^

It is in way of inconsistent, since in the first case the anonymous function (_+_) compiled successfully, but failed for the second case.

Is there something I've missed or am mistaken about? Or is it just the syntax definition?

you probably meant something like: `val f: Function2[Int,Int,Int] = _ + _`? — gilad hoch, May 25 '14 at 08:02

score 9 · Accepted Answer · answered May 25 '14 at 06:57

There is no inconsistency. In the first case you're creating anonymous function with two arguments which are then added, that is, something like this:

(1 to 5).reduceLeft((x, y) => x + y)

In the second case, however, you're creating anonymous function which returns another anonymous function with two arguments:

(x: Int, y: Int) => ((a, b) => a + b)

(It seems that you thought that (x: Int, y: Int) => _+_ is the same as (x: Int, y: Int) => x + y, and this is not so.)

In the first case you used _ + _ in a context where types of its arguments are known (as a parameter of reduceLeft). In the second case you seem to use it in a context where type of the parameters of the inner function cannot be deduced, and that's exactly what your error is about.

got it, I misuse the underscores. Thanks your very helpful answer. — WeiChing 林煒清, May 25 '14 at 09:40

I found inconsistency in Scala's underscore

1 Answers1