A schema comparison tool is a good idea. The database schema is far more complicated than most people give credit, and every difference between two database schemas has the potential to cause bugs.
If you're still keen to do it yourself, the best approach I've found is to extract the schema definitions to text, then run a text compare. As long as everything is sorted alphabetically, you can then use Compare Documents feature in Microsoft Word (or FC.EXE, DIFF or equivalent), to highlight the differences.
The following SQLPlus script outputs the schema definition alphabetically, to allow comparison. There are two sections. The first section lists each column, in the format:
table_name.column_name: data_type = data_default <nullable>
The second section lists indexes and constraints, as follows:
PK constraint_name on table_name (pk_column_list)
FK constraint_name on table_name (fk_column_list)
CHECK constraint_name on table_name (constraint_definition)
The script serves as a useful references for extracting some of the Oracle schema details. This can be good knowledge to have when you're out at client sites and you don't have your usual tools available, or when security policies prevent you from accessing a client site database directly from your own PC.
set serveroutput on;
set serveroutput on size 1000000;
declare
rowcnt pls_integer := 0;
cursor c_column is
select table_name, column_name, data_type,
data_precision, data_length, data_scale,
data_default, nullable,
decode(data_scale, null, null, ',') scale_comma,
decode(default_length, null, null, '= ') default_equals
from all_tab_columns where owner = 'BCC'
order by table_name, column_name;
cursor c_constraint is
select c.table_name, c.constraint_name,
decode(c.constraint_type,
'P','PK',
'R','FK',
'C','CHECK',
c.constraint_type) constraint_type,
c.search_condition,
cc.column_1||cc.comma_2||cc.column_2||cc.comma_3||cc.column_3||cc.comma_4||cc.column_4||
cc.comma_5||cc.column_5||cc.comma_6||cc.column_6||cc.comma_7||cc.column_7 r_columns
from all_constraints c,
( select owner, table_name, constraint_name, nvl(max(position),0) max_position,
max( decode( position, 1, column_name, null ) ) column_1,
max( decode( position, 2, decode(column_name, null, null, ',' ), null ) ) comma_2,
max( decode( position, 2, column_name, null ) ) column_2,
max( decode( position, 3, decode(column_name, null, null, ',' ), null ) ) comma_3,
max( decode( position, 3, column_name, null ) ) column_3,
max( decode( position, 4, decode(column_name, null, null, ',' ), null ) ) comma_4,
max( decode( position, 4, column_name, null ) ) column_4,
max( decode( position, 5, decode(column_name, null, null, ',' ), null ) ) comma_5,
max( decode( position, 5, column_name, null ) ) column_5,
max( decode( position, 6, decode(column_name, null, null, ',' ), null ) ) comma_6,
max( decode( position, 6, column_name, null ) ) column_6,
max( decode( position, 7, decode(column_name, null, null, ',' ), null ) ) comma_7,
max( decode( position, 7, column_name, null ) ) column_7
from all_cons_columns
group by owner, table_name, constraint_name ) cc
where c.owner = 'BCC'
and c.generated != 'GENERATED NAME'
and cc.owner = c.owner
and cc.table_name = c.table_name
and cc.constraint_name = c.constraint_name
order by c.table_name,
decode(c.constraint_type,
'P','PK',
'R','FK',
'C','CHECK',
c.constraint_type) desc,
c.constraint_name;
begin
for c_columnRow in c_column loop
dbms_output.put_line(substr(c_columnRow.table_name||'.'||c_columnRow.column_name||': '||
c_columnRow.data_type||'('||
nvl(c_columnRow.data_precision, c_columnRow.data_length)||
c_columnRow.scale_comma||c_columnRow.data_scale||') '||
c_columnRow.default_equals||c_columnRow.data_default||
' <'||c_columnRow.nullable||'>',1,255));
rowcnt := rowcnt + 1;
end loop;
for c_constraintRow in c_constraint loop
dbms_output.put_line(substr(c_constraintRow.constraint_type||' '||c_constraintRow.constraint_name||' on '||
c_constraintRow.table_name||' ('||
c_constraintRow.search_condition||
c_constraintRow.r_columns||') ',1,255));
if length(c_constraintRow.constraint_type||' '||c_constraintRow.constraint_name||' on '||
c_constraintRow.table_name||' ('||
c_constraintRow.search_condition||
c_constraintRow.r_columns||') ') > 255 then
dbms_output.put_line('... '||substr(c_constraintRow.constraint_type||' '||c_constraintRow.constraint_name||' on '||
c_constraintRow.table_name||' ('||
c_constraintRow.search_condition||
c_constraintRow.r_columns||') ',256,251));
end if;
rowcnt := rowcnt + 1;
end loop;
end;
/
Unfortunately, there are a few limitations:
- Embedded carriage returns and whitespace in data_defaults, and check constraint definitions, may be highlighted as differences, even though they have zero effect on the schema.
- Does not include alternate keys, unique indexes or performance indexes. This would require a third SELECT statement in the script, referencing all_ind_columns and all_indexes catalog views.
- Does not include security details, synonyms, packages, triggers, etc. Packages and triggers would be best compared using an approach similar to the one you originally proposed. Other aspects of the schema definition could be added to the above script.
- The FK definitions above identify the referencing foreign key columns, but not the PK or the table being referenced. Just one more detail I never got around to doing.
Even if you don't use the script. There's a certain techie pleasure in playing with this stuff. ;-)
Matthew
