2

In the past, using REBOL/Command, this worked fine. Now, I'm trying to load/library a .dll that I compiled and there is no /library refinement for load any longer. What is the equivalent in Rebol 3? Do I have to make an 'extension and import it?

kealist
  • 1,669
  • 12
  • 26

2 Answers2

4

Yes, Rebol 3 does not currently contain a Rebol 2-like DLL interface, which was limited and did not offer many useful options to wrap libraries, and e.g. callbacks were very limited too. Rebol 3 solved the situation by introducing an extension mechanism, which involves a little bit of a C code.

There was also some initiative to bring in improved Rebol 2-like DLL interface in form of a Rebol 3 extension, but the project did not work out yet, although after the ReCode conference, someone was claiming, it will come.

What you could also use is Red/System: it is a Rebol-like language, but very close to C level, so rather easy to wrap things around. Kaj De Vos created some examples, which show how to write an Rebol 3 extension as Red/System DLL.

earl
  • 40,327
  • 6
  • 58
  • 59
pekr
  • 96
  • 1
  • 3
  • Are there any good guide/tutorials for using Red/System DLL Extensions? The examples on their own are not as clear as they could be... – rgchris Jul 20 '13 at 04:43
2

Since this was answered, some versions of Rebol3 eg. Atronix, have the foreign function library compiled in so that you can 

make library! %some.dll

See https://github.com/zsx/r3/blob/atronix/make/tests/ms-drives.r for an example on windows, and https://github.com/zsx/c2r3/blob/master/demos/gtk-demos/gtk-demo.reb for a comprehensive linux example.

Graham Chiu
  • 4,856
  • 1
  • 23
  • 41