When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology:
---1---o---A
\ /
X
/ \
---2---o---o---B
The above comes from the git website, I guess it forgets about adding an arrow.
Let's look at the pic below, it is obvious how to make a criss-cross situation then. when branch A needs some code from branch B, it merges from branch B; when branch B needs some code from branch A, it mergers from branch A; here we come across the criss-cross situations then.
Even more, It is easy to figure out that branch A and branch B share ancestors 1 and 2.
