0

Get-CacheStatistics command shows that any small object (even 1 Integer) takes at least 1024 bytes in cache memory. Is it correct and is there any way to adjust AppCache to handle memory more efficient for small objects?

mateuscb
  • 10,150
  • 3
  • 52
  • 76
Иван Бабиков
  • 1

1 Answers1

0

In fact, there is an error in your understandings.

It's true taht objects are stored in the cache in a serialized form but there are other internal data structures that require memory in the cache : key, duration, named cache, regions, tags, notifications, ... take a look on capacity guide.

There is no way to manage internal cache data structure.

Cybermaxs
  • 24,378
  • 8
  • 83
  • 112
  • 1
    Well, I aware of serialization and other overheads. But it strongly looks like there is something like a "page size". You may put Int32[] or String into AppCache and Get-CacheStatistics will show: Size : 1024 ItemCount : 1 But as soon as your Int array get bigger than 847 or your string grow up to 848 there will be another cache page allocated for the cached object: Size : 2048 ItemCount : 1 That's what I meant. – Иван Бабиков Mar 14 '13 at 17:22