The question I want to ask has been asked before, but I want to know additionally since 2010:
- if service packs or MVC4 have improved the story (particularly for views)?
- is there a trick that would allow the "Add Controller" wizard to be accessible "in the usual way" from a separate assembly?
- is there a trick that would allow the "Add View" wizard to be accessible "in the usual way" from a controller action in a separate assembly?
Rant This rant is not part of my question, but I feel it represents the white elephant in the room.
One response found attached to the above question I linked, suggested that separate MVC assemblies is not pertinent to MVC "separation of concerns." I feel that answer is a bit like saying "future editions of C# will not support interaction between assemblies, because such interaction is not pertinent to Object-Oriented separation of concerns."
Both statements might be technically true, but both statements ignore that separation of concerns applies at ever-increasing levels of scope. In other words, it applies not just at an object or MVC level, but also at a component architecture level as well.
Said differently, just because ASP.NET MVC supports "separation of concerns" at an object (or Area) level, does not mean the story is finished. I would like to see Microsoft simplify the story by adding "ASP.NET MVC Component" templates, which allow for controllers and views (both with working wizards) to be readily part of a separate assembly.
Perhaps someone has already made such a thing?