I know that in MATLAB, in the 1D case, you can select elements with indexing such as a([1 5 3])
, to return the 1st, 5th, and 3rd elements of a. I have a 2D array, and would like to select out individual elements according to a set of tuples I have. So I may want to get a(1,3), a(1,4), a(2,5)
and so on. Currently the best I have is diag(a(tuples(:,1), tuples(:,2))
, but this requires a prohibitive amount of memory for larger a and/or tuples. Do I have to convert these tuples into linear indices, or is there a cleaner way of accomplishing what I want without taking so much memory?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1.2k times
4

sas4740
- 4,510
- 8
- 26
- 23
-
1you might want to look at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10146082/indexing-of-unknown-dimensional-matrix, as it covers the same problem you have – Gunther Struyf Oct 23 '12 at 06:46
-
Or you could look [here](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12294232/changing-multiple-elements-of-known-coordinates-of-a-matrix-without-a-for-loop/12294606#12294606) to see essentially the same answers. – angainor Oct 23 '12 at 08:26
-
Thanks for pointing them out; I searched and only found cases of logical indexing. – sas4740 Oct 23 '12 at 12:18
3 Answers
6
Converting to linear indices seems like a legitimate way to go:
indices = tuples(:, 1) + size(a,1)*(tuples(:,2)-1);
selection = a(indices);
Note that this is also implement in the Matlab built-in solution sub2ind
, as in nate'2 answer:
a(sub2ind(size(a), tuples(:,1),tuples(:,2)))
however,
a = rand(50);
tuples = [1,1; 1,4; 2,5];
start = tic;
for ii = 1:1e4
indices = tuples(:,1) + size(a,1)*(tuples(:,2)-1); end
time1 = toc(start);
start = tic;
for ii = 1:1e4
sub2ind(size(a),tuples(:,1),tuples(:,2)); end
time2 = toc(start);
round(time2/time1)
which gives
ans =
38
so although sub2ind
is easier on the eyes, it's also ~40 times slower. If you have to do this operation often, choose the method above. Otherwise, use sub2ind
to improve readability.

Rody Oldenhuis
- 37,726
- 7
- 50
- 96

Brian L
- 3,201
- 1
- 15
- 15
-
1NOTE: Matlab is 1-based, so you'll have to use `m*(tuples(:,2)-1)`. Otherwise, this solution is some ~40 times faster than `sub2ind`, so it has my preference :) – Rody Oldenhuis Oct 23 '12 at 05:51
-
@RodyOldenhuis I would also prefer this one. However, [I previously got mildly criticized](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12294232/changing-multiple-elements-of-known-coordinates-of-a-matrix-without-a-for-loop/12294606#12294606) on SO for that, and `sub2ind` was the way to go. Interesting how people change their mind in what they like :) – angainor Oct 23 '12 at 08:24
-
@angainor: Ah well, there are as many opinions as there are people. I just wonder what the heck `sub2ind` does to make it consume so much time...You know, we should start a new toolbox, something like [lightspeed](http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/minka/software/lightspeed/), especially for things like this :) – Rody Oldenhuis Oct 23 '12 at 08:41
-
1@RodyOldenhuis You know how the story goes: "... MATLAB has to take care of the general cases, and your case is special, so of course MATLAB can be slower ...". But it is much more general ;) – angainor Oct 23 '12 at 08:49
3
if x and y are vectors of the x y values of matrix a, then sub2und should solve your problem:
a(sub2ind(size(a),x,y))
For example
a=magic(3)
a =
8 1 6 3 5 7 4 9 2
x = [3 1];
y = [1 2];
a(sub2ind(size(a),x,y))
ans =
4 1

bla
- 25,846
- 10
- 70
- 101
-
Both methods are good. This one also seamlessly works for higher dimensions, +1. Although for faster execution the other is better. – angainor Oct 23 '12 at 08:20
0
you can reference the 2D matlab position with a 1D number as in:
a = [3 4 5;
6 7 8;
9 10 11;];
a(1) = 3;
a(2) = 6;
a(6) = 10;
So if you can get the positions in a matrix like this:
a([(col1-1)*(rowMax)+row1, (col2-1)*(rowMax)+row2, (col3-1)*(rowMax)+row3])
note: rowmax is 3 in this case
will give you a list of the elements at col1/row1 col2/row2 and col3/row3.
so if
row1 = col1 = 1
row2 = col2 = 2
row3 = col3 = 3
you will get:
[3, 7, 11]
back.

Fantastic Mr Fox
- 32,495
- 27
- 95
- 175