It is probably obfuscated, but I don't believe it's not complete.
I wouldn't recommend this approach. Why can't you just catch the exception in your code? Just do it and move on.
Another way that's preferred to editing someone else's code is to write a wrapper of your own that extends that class. Catch the exception in the method that offends you.
Both are preferable to decompiling and modifying someone else's code. That's a recipe for long-term grief.
Like this:
public class BadLibrary {
public void toast() { throw new IllegalArgumentException(); }
}
public class MyWrapper extends BadLibrary {
public void toast() {
try {
super.toast();
} catch (Exception e) {
// log, print, or ignore.
}
}
}