I am attempting to create a template using Smarty for php. I would like the template to be reusable so I inheriting it and substituting values using blocks. This works fine except when I need to access these block values in sub-templates. I am calling these sub-templates using smarty's {include} function.
Example:
Template-Parent (template.tpl):
<html>
<head>
{include file=sub_template.tpl}
</head>
<body>
{block name=title}No Title Provided{/block}
</body>
</html>
Sub-Template (sub_template.tpl)
<title>{block name=title}No Title Provided{/block}</title>
Template-Child (template_child.tpl)
{extends file="template.tpl"}
{block name=title}My Website!{/block}
When I view the site, the output is:
<html>
<head>
<title>No Title Provided</title>
</head>
<body>
My Website!
</body>
</html>
After doing some reaserch I did see a note on smarty's website about enclosing {include} functions in dummy {block} tags but have had varied levels of success getting this to work.
Note: If you have a subtemplate which is included with {include} and it contains {block} areas it works only if the {include} itself is called from within a surrounding {block}. In the final parent template you may need a dummy {block} for it.(http://www.smarty.net/docs/en/advanced.features.template.inheritance.tpl)
Due to this, I have tried:
<html>
<head>
{block name=dummy}{include file=sub_template.tpl}{/block}
</head>
<body>
{block name=title}No Title Provided{/block}
</body>
</html>
This seems to work until I make any change to sub-template. As soon as a change to the sub-template is made, it once again stops responding to the block values set in the child.
Have I misunderstood what the notice was referring to about placing the {include} in dummy block tags or is this a bug with smarty? I am not currently using caching but my other thought was that maybe this is a sub-template caching problem.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated, thanks!