Comparison of hem, browserify, stitch and others

Asked Aug 03 '12 at 09:30

Active Jun 23 '13 at 14:41

Viewed 2,613 times

I've seen some node modules that allow compiling CommonJS/Node.js modules for the browser. Until now I've found:

browserify
hem
stitch
browserbuild
volo
cajon

I am currently using browserify and I noticed some overhead of 300? lines when compiling. Are there any noticeable differences between those tools that should make me switch? Or do you even now some better tools?

edited Jun 23 '13 at 14:41

abernier

27,030
20
83
114

asked Aug 03 '12 at 09:30

BrowserBuild sounds the most promising. – Eliran Malka Aug 03 '12 at 09:50
2

@EliranM. Why do you think so?! – Aug 03 '12 at 09:52
You should add [volo](https://github.com/volojs/volo) and [cajon](https://github.com/requirejs/cajon) to your list. Cajon is an AMD module loader that supports CommonJS module formats. Volo is comparable to hem, IMO. – rharper Aug 04 '12 at 18:13
@rharper Thanks for the additions, they're added. – Aug 04 '12 at 19:43

Comparison of hem, browserify, stitch and others

0 Answers0