0

scanmem is much slower than CheatEngine (although I run CheatEngine in my VirtualBox). Further scanmem is not able to scan for any-values (*) but CheatEngine is. How comes? Is there a better alternative for scanmem for Linux users?

Martijn Pieters
  • 1,048,767
  • 296
  • 4,058
  • 3,343
arminb
  • 2,036
  • 3
  • 24
  • 43
  • 1
    Will cheat engine work under WINe? I have this feeling it won't. Have you tried? – Wug Jun 22 '12 at 23:22
  • I haven't. But this is a "dirty" alternative. I want to have it clean linux based. Besides it seems logical to me that you only can scan process which are started with wine if you use CheatEngine with wine. – arminb Jun 22 '12 at 23:25

1 Answers1

0

Perhaps give Memscanner a try? It hasn't had project updates since 2009, but it might be worth a shot.

Etheryte
  • 24,589
  • 11
  • 71
  • 116