I ran into the same issue. It would be a much nicer design if each series had a store instead of having one store per chart.
I had one long list of metric values in metricDataStore. Each metric value has a description. I wanted all the metric values with the same description displayed on one (and only one) series. I had my value providers for each series return null for both the x and y axis if the value wasn't supposed to be in the series.
This seems like a hack to me but it works for my usage:
myChart = new Chart<MetricData>();
myChart.setStore(metricDataStore);
.
.
.
for (MetricInfo info : metricInfoData) {
LineSeries<MetricData> series = new LineSeries<MetricData>();
series.setChart(myChart);
series.setSmooth(false);
series.setShownInLegend(true);
series.setHighlighting(true);
series.setYAxisPosition(Chart.Position.LEFT);
series.setYField(new MetricValueProvider(info.getName()));
series.setXAxisPosition(Chart.Position.BOTTOM);
series.setXField(new MetricTimeProvider(info.getName()));
myChart.addSeries(series);
}
.
.
.
private class MetricTimeProvider extends Object implements ValueProvider<MetricData, Long> {
private String metricName;
public MetricTimeProvider(String metricName) {
this.metricName = metricName;
}
@Override
public Long getValue(MetricData m) {
if (metricName != null && metricName.equals(m.getLongDesc()))
return m.getId();
else
return null;
}
@Override
public void setValue(MetricData m, Long value) {
}
@Override
public String getPath() {
return null;
}
}
private class MetricValueProvider extends Object implements ValueProvider<MetricData, Double> {
private String metricName;
public MetricValueProvider(String metricName) {
this.metricName = metricName;
}
@Override
public Double getValue(MetricData m) {
if (metricName != null && metricName.equals(m.getLongDesc()))
return m.getMetricValue();
else
return null;
}
@Override
public void setValue(MetricData m, Double value) {
}
@Override
public String getPath() {
return null;
}
}