Reference count of Managed Objects

Question

I have class A (subclass of NSManagedObject) that has a property of class B (also subclass of NSManagedObject), the property is @synthesize not @dynamic, there is no relationship between A and B in my model, I just want that A will keep a reference to a B object while he(A) is alive.
(When I first fetch object A from db, his B property is null)

I Override the B property getter, so when first called he will fetch the B object from db.

Now do I need to retain the fetch result of B?
I think I heard that it is not a good idea to retain objects that the NSManagedObjectContext manage.

score 2 · Accepted Answer · answered May 06 '12 at 10:18

There's no problem with retaining NSManagedObject — go ahead and do it. The only thing to be careful about is if you're holding onto an object and it is getting deleted. Then you have a reference to an object, but if you try to read or set any value of it, you'll get an exception. Because this is tricky to update, Core Data does delete propagation for you when you're using Core Data relationship.

So, as stated above: Use relationships. There's nothing wrong with having multiple relationships between A and B. You just need to have the corresponding inverse relationships, too.

For example, you can do something like this:

Person
  favoriteBook (to-1, inverse is favoriteByPersons)
  authoredBooks (to-many, inverse is authors)

Book
  authors (to-many, inverse is authoredBooks)
  favoriteByPersons (to-many, inverse is favoriteBook)

Let Core Data do the heavy lifting for you. Relationship management is one of the things Core Data is really good at. Don't try to copy that yourself.

Thanks :) i didn't know I can have two relationships to the same entity. — Eyal, May 06 '12 at 15:14

Mundi · Answer 2 · 2012-05-05T20:09:09.017

0

You should clearly go with a to-one relationship between A and B. This is what Core Data is set up to manage for you. It's simpler, more robust, and you do not have to worry about memory issues.

edited May 05 '12 at 20:09

answered May 05 '12 at 09:16

Mundi

79,884
17
117
140

The problem is I already have a to-many relationship between A and B, so I can't have another.. – Eyal May 05 '12 at 09:30
You write in your question: "There is no relationship between `A` and `B`". So what is it now? Please edit the question and specify clearly what you want to accomplish. – Mundi May 05 '12 at 20:10

Reference count of Managed Objects

2 Answers2