13

Stray cats are extremely common in Israel and there is a common urban legend that they were imported by the British during the mandate period to combat a rat problem.

For example, you can see this claim repeated in this article from the Jerusalem post:

Ever since the British first brought cats over to Israel (then Palestine) in the first half of the 20th century to combat the rat problem, cats are a frequent sight on Israeli streets, particularly in Jerusalem.

Did the British cause the current stray cat problem?

Note: I assume there were some cats in the region beforehand, but the question is whether the British were the significant factor which caused the current overabundance of stray cats.

Malper
  • 716
  • 5
  • 12
  • 12
    It seems to me that this question has been overzealously edited. Now it’s just about if British people introduced cats into Israel which is obviously false, and doesn’t reflect the intention of the source. The more interesting part was the combatting of the rat problem leading to an abundance of cats in Jerusalem. – FifthArrow Jan 02 '22 at 00:42
  • @KobeGote: I am examining my assumptions: (1) That feral cats are fungible. (2) If there is a niche for them, long-term they can breed faster than they can be imported. With those assumptions, how could you (with evidence) assign blame for the feral population on cats imported 70 years ago, unless they were the first? – Oddthinking Jan 02 '22 at 10:45
  • 4
    @Oddthinking The title is an excellent bait, I came over to visit the page because with Egypt just next door, it's impossible that the feral cat population in Israel was created by the Brits. The edited title; however, strongly suggests that this the assumption made by the OP. In fact, the citation does not claim that cats did not exist in Palestine prior to the 1920s-30s, it mentions that the ***current problem*** of stray cats can be blamed on the British. – Mari-Lou A Jan 02 '22 at 13:26
  • 1
    This question should be reverted to its original form. The edit is wrong and completely changes it. The original title & question was simply: "Is Israel's stray cat problem due to the British?" & "Is there any evidence that this is true?" The original question, and it's source, _does not ask_ if the British _introduced_ cats. – Self Evident Jan 02 '22 at 20:44
  • @Oddthinking The last question in your comment seems exactly the question that was being asked. One hypothetical answer could be that prior to British involvement the feral population was actually small enough that it could be controlled through pest control and that situation grew out control because of a large number of additional cats introduced by the British. – TimRias Jan 02 '22 at 22:43
  • Closed while we resolve what the question is. I understand some people are unhappy with my edit, but they haven't addressed the problem with the original wording. How could you possibly answer a question that [tries to assign a single cause to a complex problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_the_single_cause)? There is no way to answer it. – Oddthinking Jan 03 '22 at 04:35
  • @mmeent gives an example of the problem: You could equally blame the insufficient pest control. – Oddthinking Jan 03 '22 at 04:41
  • 2
    @Oddthinking I think the question in its original form is perfectly answerable. Possible hypothetical answers could vary from “no, the British didn’t do anything that increased the feral cat population” via “the British contributed to the problem by importing lots of Cats” to “yes the current problem is entirely the result of British era policies”. (I suspect the former rather than the latter, but either way this is answerable.) – TimRias Jan 03 '22 at 06:56
  • @mmeent: And what hypothetical evidence would you use to show "the current problem is entirely the result of British era policies" (for example). – Oddthinking Jan 03 '22 at 08:40
  • Title: **Was the British intervention to solve the rat infestation responsible for today's Israel's stray cat population?** OR **Are the British to blame for Israel's stray cats problem?** The former is less of a clickbait, admittedly, but at least we would not have the top answer saying that cats have inhabited Israel/Palestine for at least 8,000 years. – Mari-Lou A Jan 03 '22 at 08:55
  • 1
    @Oddthinking Hypothetically? A peer reviewed study of leading pestemologists at Harvard, analyzing the problem of stray cats in Israel showing the population was perfectly under control prior to a number of disastrous policy decisions of the British leading to an uncontrollable cat population, would do the trick. Do I think this is likely to exist? No, but I also don’t think this is the likely answer. More likely, the answer is much more nuanced. (Or the claim is simply an urban legend as alluded to in one of the answers.) – TimRias Jan 03 '22 at 11:35
  • 1
    I've edited the question to clarify my intent (it's obvious that there were cats in the region before the British, but the question is whether they were the primary cause of the current overabundance of strays). – Malper Jan 03 '22 at 17:28
  • @Mari-LouA Whether we should blame the British for a feral cat problem in Israel is too much of a subjective question for this site. Whether some British release of feral cats ever occurred in the past is a matter of facts that we can answer. So also is it a matter of facts whether feral cats are endemic to the area, or have been there for some time long before British intervention. I support the current closure. I suggest a meta post or editing according to previous edits and comments here if the OP wants to reopen it. –  Jan 03 '22 at 18:16
  • 1
    Based on @fredsbend's suggestion, I created a meta-post so we can figure how to reopen this. https://skeptics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4813/we-cant-blame-the-british-how-can-we-fix-the-israeli-cat-question – Oddthinking Jan 03 '22 at 20:19

3 Answers3

19

No, cats have been in Israel from at least 6000 BCE, and the land of Israel has had considerable connections with Egypt, where cats were worshiped. From Cats in Ancient Jewish Society by Joshua Schwartz from Bar Ilan University:

[...] since some of the earliest cats found in Palestine may have ultimately come from Egypt[...]

Cats were apparently found in Jericho as early as the pre-pottery Neolithic period, or sometime before 6000 BCE. There is unfortunately little that is known about these animals and at most it might be suggested that these cats co-existed in some form with humans, although they would hardly have been considered domesticated.

It is unknown whether there was any continuation of this early line of cats with those found in Palestine at a later date. As we stated above, there is a strong possibility that these ‘later’ cats came from Egypt and this might indeed be the source of the ivory carving of a cat from Lachish, c. 1700 BCE.

Gordon Davisson
  • 272
  • 1
  • 2
  • 6
SIMEL
  • 29,037
  • 14
  • 123
  • 139
  • 4
    I'm pretty sure that some feline breeds are even endemic to the Middle East. –  Jan 01 '22 at 20:36
  • 2
    @fredsbend, the Middle East is larger than just Israel and it's possible for an animal to be naturally bound to just a part of it. Myna is a bird endemic to (also) parts of Iraq and Iran, brought to Israel only in the last few decades by people. It is already a serious threat to the local ecosystem and the 4th most populous bird in Israel. – SIMEL Jan 01 '22 at 20:58
  • 1
    @fredsbend "Some feline breeds" ... presumably the "lions" mentioned in the Hebrew scriptures were felines... – GEdgar Jan 01 '22 at 21:41
  • 1
    The “original” question isn't who were the *first* to introduce cats into Israel or when this occurred but whether the British solution of curbing the rat population in Israel was to increase the cat population. And if this solution has led to an increase in the number of stray cats particularly in Jerusalem. – Mari-Lou A Jan 02 '22 at 13:13
  • This answers the question title, but who would possibly believe that Israel/Palestine had never seen a cat before the 20th century? – Mari-Lou A Jan 02 '22 at 13:15
  • @Mari-LouA, as cats multiply exponentially, introducing more cats to an already existing population wouldn't change the balance and wouldn't cause them to start multiplying more than before. Unless the claim would claim that the British introduced a specific breed of cats, then yes, the saying that the British introduced cats to Israel imply directly that the claimant believes that there were no cats prior to it, either in Israel or specifically in Jerusalem. – SIMEL Jan 03 '22 at 08:39
14

The other answers have shown that cats have been in (now) Israel for thousands of years. The extended claim of British importing cats in the ~1930s to deal with a rat problem appears to be an urban legend:

Local folklore has it that the British are to blame for Israel’s stray cat population, having brought cats in during the period of the Mandate in order to get rid of rats.

Yet the problem could have been created long before that: Geneticists from the National Cancer Institute study established that the world’s 600 million cats are descended from five wildcat matriarchs, including at least one from deserts of Israel, so it may be that the British are not entirely to blame.
Jessica Steinberg, Stray cats and their Tel Aviv strut, The Times of Israel, 2012.

I didn't find mention of the claim prior to 2012 (e.g. israel british cats, restricted to <=2011, does not give any relevant hits). I also didn't find mention of a rat problem in (now) Israel circa 1930 (e.g. palestine rat problem 1930 doesn't come up with relevant hits).

The above-mentioned study more specifically states:

The results revealed five genetic clusters, or lineages, of wildcats. Four of these lineages corresponded neatly with four of the known subspecies of wildcat and dwelled in specific places: F. silvestris silvestris in Europe, F. s. bieti in China, F. s. ornata in Central Asia and F. s. cafra in southern Africa. The fifth lineage, however, included not only the fifth known subspecies of wildcat—F. s. lybica in the Middle East—but also the hundreds of domestic cats that were sampled, including purebred and mixed-breed felines from the U.S., the U.K. and Japan. In fact, genetically, F. s. lybica wildcats collected in remote deserts of Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia were virtually indistinguishable from domestic cats. That the domestic cats grouped with F. s. lybica alone among wildcats meant that domestic cats arose in a single broad locale, the Middle East, and not in other places where wildcats are native.
Driscoll et al., The Taming of the Cat, Sci Am., 2009 (pdf).

Here's a photo of an African wildcat (F. s. lybica):

F. s. lybica wildcat
Image by Sonelle, at the Johannesburg Zoo; sourced from Felis silvestris lybica, Wikispecies.

Driscoll et al. also mentions a ~3700 year old ivory cat statuette made in (now) Israel, which they conclude "suggests cats were a common sight around human settlements in the Fertile Crescent" (they also mention a ~9000 year old feline molar tooth).

Another news report makes a similar claim:

"Because there are so many cats, it's become so emotional in both ways," says Idit Gunther, a veterinarian and lecturer in veterinary medicine at Hebrew University of Jerusalem. ...

Many tour guides and Jerusalem residents blame the British, who ruled the city between 1917 and 1948, for bringing cats to the city via their ships. But the felines have lived in Jerusalem for thousands of years, Gunther says. In fact, the genetic makeup of most of Israel's street cats shows they are directly descended from the original African cat domesticated by the ancient Egyptians, and do not include genes of any wild European cat species, she says.
Sara Toth Stub, Jerusalem's Controversial Cats, USA Today, 2019.

Israeli zoologists offer the following reasons for Israel's current cat problems:

There are several reasons for this. First, in Israel organic waste is often not properly treated. Food remains are found everywhere near garbage containers, in yards and parks, readily available for cats. Second, feeding stray cats is a widespread phenomenon in Israeli towns and villages. Individuals providing food for dozens and even close to a hundred cats are not uncommon. Third, Israel has a mild climate and regularly-fed cats easily survive the winter.
Brickner-Braun, Geffen, Yom-Tov, The Domestic Cat as a Predator of Israeli Wildlife, Israeli Journal of Ecology and Evolution, 2007. (pdf)

Rebecca J. Stones
  • 7,948
  • 6
  • 37
  • 68
  • A fourth reason is that Israel lacks a tradition of spay/neuter, which is controversial for religious prohibitions. https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/.premium-does-jewish-law-permit-neutering-animals-1.5424020 – Andrew Lazarus Jan 04 '22 at 18:40
5

I also found the document referred to in the answer from SIMEL, which led me to this –

The William Davidson Talmud is a free digital edition of the Babylonian Talmud with parallel translations, interlinked to major commentaries, biblical citations, Midrash, Halakhah, and an ever-growing library of Jewish texts.

An extract entitled Berakhot 6a contains this:

One who seeks to know that the demons exist should place fine ashes around his bed, and in the morning the demons’ footprints appear like chickens’ footprints, in the ash. One who seeks to see them should take the afterbirth of a firstborn female black cat, born to a firstborn female black cat, burn it in the fire, grind it and place it in his eyes, and he will see them. He must then place the ashes in an iron tube sealed with an iron seal [gushpanka] lest the demons steal it from him, and then seal the opening so he will not be harmed. Rav Beivai bar Abaye ‡ performed this procedure, saw the demons, and was harmed. The Sages prayed for mercy on his behalf and he was healed.

‡ Rav Bivi b. Abaye
c.350 - c.375 CE

Rav Bivi b. Abaye was the son of Abaye and the head judge in Pumbedita, which is in modern-day Iraq.

Pumbedita

The city had a large Jewish population and was famed for its Pumbedita Academy - whose scholarship, together with the city of Sura, gave rise to the Babylonian Talmud.

We also know from the references to Babylonia in The Bible that the Near East and the Middle East did not live in isolation from each other. Cats are associated with human society (unlike wild species who may or may not inhabit a particular area), and it is reasonable to suppose that wherever there are human centres of population, there will be cats, who did not need to wait for the British to import them into Palestine.

It may be that this answer isn't specific enough and will attract downvotes, if so I'll delete it.

Weather Vane
  • 7,653
  • 1
  • 32
  • 42
  • 1
    I *really* want to see a demon, but... **not that much!!!** – RonJohn Jan 01 '22 at 23:06
  • @RonJohn apparently it is essential to seal the opening properly – we should all learn from the mistakes of others, perhaps you'll do better... – Weather Vane Jan 01 '22 at 23:49
  • I've been watching Harry Potter films the last four nights, so the whole procedure doesn't seem unusual at all to me. –  Jan 04 '22 at 17:03