48

This was spurred from a recent related question. I started looking into whether male chicks are ground up. It makes sense that they are, but I'm having a hard time finding conclusive evidence.

Many egg farming operations macerate the male chicks. This is a seemingly innocuous word that literally means the male chicks get ground up alive.

Sentient Media: Egg Farming

France on Tuesday promised to outlaw the grisly practice of grinding up male chicks as soon as they’ve hatched, becoming the latest country to take a stand against an industry-wide procedure known as culling.

Washington Post: France says its poultry industry will stop shredding male chicks alive by 2022

How are agriculture industry standards, especially in industrialized countries, found? What is a source of good authority that basically says or shows statistically the number of farms that cull male chicks?

(I found a few research papers, but they were blocked by paywalls.)

Also, I realize the question title says 'most' while the first quote says 'many'. Although, just briefly looking into the egg/chick industry, I found that most animals are intensively farmed (otherwise known as factory farmed). Deductively, I take this to mean "most" is valid enough.

adamaero
  • 1,254
  • 1
  • 10
  • 23
  • 1
    Related: [Do most people have no idea where their food comes from or how it’s made?](https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/47703/do-most-people-have-no-idea-where-their-food-comes-from-or-how-it-s-made) – David Hammen May 30 '20 at 12:49
  • 20
    This question is yet another example that most people indeed do not know where their food comes from. Male hormones impart a gamy taste and a stringy texture to meat that many people do not like. This is a key reason why capons (castrated male chickens) are much preferred over roosters, and steers (castrated male cattle) are much preferred over bulls. – David Hammen May 30 '20 at 12:56
  • 1
    Sanity check 1 failed: The word "macerate" means to soften food by soaking it in a liquid, according to Cambridge Dictionary – user253751 May 30 '20 at 17:42
  • 1
    @user253751 the word is also used for different things. Specifically, it's referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maceration_(sewage) – Erik May 30 '20 at 18:58
  • 1
    In the more "humane" version, the male chickens are first CO2-stunned. Research for "even more humane" methods ([prenatal gender test and abortion of males](https://www.bmel.de/DE/themen/tiere/tierschutz/tierwohl-forschung-in-ovo.html)) is work in progress – Hagen von Eitzen May 30 '20 at 21:14
  • 5
    Note (regarding "most" or "many" farms) that these practices would only occur on hatching farms, which are a distinct minority of all farms. In general, the industrialization of farming means that most farms that raise chickens (as either broilers or layers) will purchase chicks from a grower rather than hatching their own. Likewise, the laid eggs are shipped elsewhere to be prepped for either hatching or sale. The large companies such as Purdue will have dedicated hatcheries that provide chicks for all farms associated with them. – GalacticCowboy May 30 '20 at 23:39
  • 9
    You mentioned hitting paywalls in front of research papers, so I just wanted to let you know that in the future you can circumvent those paywalls by copy-pasting the link for the paper into [sci-hub](https://sci-hub.tw/). – curlycharcoal May 31 '20 at 06:28
  • 1
    i find it rather dubious that the french would ban this, but still allow the force-feeding of ducks. Something which is just as gruesome. – Neil Meyer May 31 '20 at 06:44
  • 3
    @NeilMeyer cultural hangover is a powerful force. – Tim May 31 '20 at 10:04
  • @NeilMeyer Not to mention that it will be stopped "by 2022". I understand that industry can't switch overnight, but if you can't stop doing something for two years, do you really think it's that bad/urgent? – Z. Cochrane May 31 '20 at 21:09
  • 1
    @HagenvonEitzen - Whether asphyxiation is more humane than near-instantaneous crushing is arguable. – David Hammen Jun 01 '20 at 03:32
  • 3
    Funny enough, I just now noticed a "male chicks raised as well" sticker on my organic eggs package. You are not the only one being concerned. – Peter - Reinstate Monica Jun 01 '20 at 09:11
  • @DavidHammen You can read "more humane" in all cases, as that which "makes the actor and on-lookers feel less bad about their actions." Hanging is arguably less painful than death by injection, yet it is not considered more humane. – jpaugh Jun 01 '20 at 20:13
  • @Peter-ReinstateMonica I'm curious how "male chicks raised as well" works with _eggs_... The fact that you purchased them as eggs usually tends to imply that none of them were raised. :) – reirab Jun 02 '20 at 00:59
  • 1
    In Germany, there is a program called "Bruderhähne" (brother roosters), where a number of male chicks (of egg-laying breed) are parallely raised for meat. This is more expensive, therefore the eggs marketed as "Bruderhähne" cost a little more. – pat3d3r Jun 02 '20 at 09:08
  • 1
    I grew up on a chicken farm. We bought layers as day-old chicks in boxes of 100. Each box contained four extra, to account for the 4% who didn't get sorted out by the sexers (who were Japanese guys, in those days). So there were about 4 cocks to every 100 hens. Yes, we raised and ate them, but they were skinny. I didn't realise chickens could be big and fleshy till I left home. – RedSonja Jun 03 '20 at 05:08
  • Does anybody know if the "macerated" chicks are used for something (human or animal feeding for instance) or just discarded? – Jaime Santa Cruz Sep 13 '21 at 17:16
  • 1
    @JaimeSantaCruz I recall hearing they're commonly used for pet food. – adamaero Sep 16 '21 at 17:22

2 Answers2

65

The early to mid 1900s saw the division of chickens into breeds that produced lots of eggs versus breeds that produced lots of tasty meat. Males of the first type (egg layers) obviously don't lay eggs, and they don't grow large enough to produce lots of tasty meat.

It costs factory farmers much, much more in terms of feed and real estate to raise those subpar male chicks to a stage where they can yield even a small amount of substandard meat than it does to simply get rid of them shortly after they hatch (and their sex is determined). So they get rid of them. The specific mechanism used varies with country, but the end result is the same: male chicks of the egg-laying breeds do not live long after hatching. The European Union recommends that gassing young male chicks is the most humane approach while the US recommends instantaneous crushing young male chicks is the most humane approach.

There are moves afoot to sex the fertile eggs of egg-laying chicken breeds before the eggs hatch and destroy the male-containing eggs before they hatch, but it is arguable whether this is a difference that makes any difference. The eggs that contain male embryos will still be destroyed.

David Hammen
  • 14,500
  • 9
  • 57
  • 51
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been [moved to chat](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/108731/discussion-on-answer-by-david-hammen-do-male-chicks-get-ground-up-on-most-farms). – Jamiec Jun 01 '20 at 08:07
28

The Wikipedia page on chick culling provides a good overview.

Note that quoted claims confuse the general practice of culling with the specific practice of maceration. Culling also includes other methods, such as gassing with carbon dioxide.

USA

The American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals (2020) support the use of maceration:

Maceration, via use of a specially designed mechanical apparatus having rotating blades or projections, causes immediate fragmentation and death of poultry up to 72 hours old and embryonated eggs. A review of the use of commercially available macerators for euthanasia of chicks, poults, and pipped eggs indicates that death by maceration in poultry up to 72 hours old occurs immediately with minimal pain and distress. Maceration is an alternative to the use of CO2 for euthanasia of poultry up to 72 hours old. Maceration is believed to be equivalent to cervical dislocation and cranial compression as to time element, and is considered to be an acceptable means of euthanasia for newly hatched poultry by the Federation of Animal Science Societies, Agriculture Canada, World Organization for Animal Health, and European Union.

Smithsonian Magazine reported:

On June 9 [2016], United Egg Producers, an egg-farming co-op that owns approximately 95 percent of the United States’ egg-laying hens, announced that it would do away with the practice. In a statement by The Humane League, an animal rights advocacy group that worked to secure the commitment by UEP, culling will stop “by 2020 or as soon as it is…economically feasible.”

[Note that the commitment was to cull the male embryos still in the egg, rather than waiting until after they hatch.]

However, in January 2020 the Sydney Morning Herald quoted

United Egg Producers president Chad Gregory said in a statement on Wednesday that his organisation remained committed to adopting new technologies aimed to stymie culling, a goal that he called both "a priority and the right thing to do".

But, he added, "A workable, scalable, solution is not yet available."

So, it isn't clear if they are still using maceration, but they haven't met their pledge to stop (post-hatch) culling.

UK

A 2010 article from The Telegraph suggests maceration isn't the preferred method in the UK (although it is legal):

A spokesman [for the British Egg Information Service] said that male chicks are usually gassed rather than put alive into the macerating machines and the bodies are a `useful source of food' to captive reptiles and birds of prey.

Australia

A 2016 Triple J article confirmed it was "common practice":

According to John Coward from Egg Farmers Australia, maceration isn’t only common practice in the industry, it’s also considered the most humane way to “dispose” of male chicks.

Oddthinking
  • 140,378
  • 46
  • 548
  • 638