5

Currently there is a tweet being widely shared (as of time of writing this question, it has 148,103 Retweets and 517,460 Likes) that claims:

When Lady Gaga was in university, there was a Facebook group called “Stefani Germanotta, you’ll never be famous”

accompanied by the following image:

Image of purported Facebook group

Searching on Google or DuckDuckGo for "Lady Gaga university" returns several websites sharing the tweet or the claim.

My problems:

  • It can be argued that Lady Gaga became famous mid-2008
  • In 2008 the Facebook UI looked very different from the one shown in the image. See here:

enter image description here

  • Searching on Facebook yields only a page (not a group) that seems to have been created at the start of 2016 (i.e. the day the article I link below was published on PRI, indicating that it has been possibly been created in response to that article.)
  • Current groups on Facebook with that name have all been created in the last 2 days (i.e. after the tweet was written).

I understand that the original group might have been deleted or might not be publicly reachable, so the the last two points above might not be as significant.

Reverse-searching the image on Google finds this page from 2016 that links to this other page.

In this last piece, the author claims they saw such a group, but they offer no proof for that. Also, they claim that they saw its contents, while the tweet shares an image of a group whose contents cannot be accessed by outsiders.

So, did such a group exist before August 2008?

Federico
  • 1,810
  • 3
  • 18
  • 25

1 Answers1

8
  1. It's not entirely impossible that this group existed in some form. Lady Gaga left NYU in 2005, at which point there were already groups devoted to defaming people on Facebook.
  2. The details of the story as told to PRI by Lauren Bohn are impossible. Bohn writes:

The page housed pictures of a pretty Norah Jones-esque young 18-year-old NYU student who sang and played piano at local bars. [...]

I also remember one dude posting a flyer for one of her upcoming gigs at a local village bar. He had clearly stomped on the flyer, an outline of his muddy sole [soul] struggling to eclipse her name.

In 2005, Facebook groups did not yet have photos. You can confirm that by reading this prolix 2006 undergraduate term paper about beer-related Facebook groups.

“Nati Light Drinkers of America” in ohio.facebook.com has a membership of 2053 people at the time of this writing (March 12, 2006). There are odes, poems, feeling of admiration, stories that reminisce the first time the person drank Natural Light, and other messages involving Natural Light.

[... My] research could not prove or disprove the actions on Facebook.

The reason that the love for Nati Light was expressed through poems and messages, and that this zealous beer group researcher could not prove that alcohol consumption was going on, is that users could not post photos to groups at the time. (You could also confirm that statement through this Mashable article from August 2006, which notes that photos are uploaded exclusively to profile pages.) I'm not sure when exactly photos were added to Groups but it was before this blog post in 2009.

Lauren Bohn may have seen a group with photos of Lady Gaga at some point, but she did not see it when Lady Gaga was an 18-year-old NYU student. She may be remembering a real group that existed in 2005, but if that's the case, her memory has been severely distorted over time.

Avery
  • 44,313
  • 16
  • 183
  • 179
  • 3
    Upvoted, it's probably impossible to determine whether or not the group existed without someone with knowledge of facebook's inner workings confirming or denying the existence of the group, but there is no way that photos of her could have been on facebook in 2005 because the feature wasn't implemented yet. As someone who's been on facebook since 2005, it was drastically different from what it is today. – DenisS Feb 28 '19 at 18:06
  • 1
    I find it entirely plausible that the group existed, there were plenty like it—many tongue-in-cheek—back then. The screenshot is obviously not from that time, of course. – Kevin Feb 28 '19 at 22:01