24

Lessig (1995, pp. 964–965) writes:

Before the 1960s, motorcyclists in Soviet Russia did not wear helmets. In part this was because of a lack of any perceived need to wear helmets; in part it was because the Soviet economy failed to produce any helmets. Helmets were worn in Western Europe, however, and like most Western goods, by the late 1950s, helmets were slowly finding their way into Soviet Russia. Soon, some Russians began to wear motorcycle helmets produced in Western Europe. The primary design of these was French, and they were what we would now think of as half-helmets, primarily white.

When these helmets first began to appear, the Soviet government quickly reacted against them. For despite bearing the medical costs associated with cycling accidents, the Soviets perceived a much greater cost to the Soviet state associated with individuals wearing helmets, that is, the invasion of Western style. Because helmets were produced only in the West, wearing them was a political statement antithetical to the message the Soviet government wanted broadcast.

Thus began an extraordinary and self-conscious campaign by the Soviet government to vilify the wearers of motorcycle helmets. Cartoons appeared in the popular (read: government-controlled) press, mocking the "white heads" on cycles. By the early 1960s, people began wearing helmets only at night, to avoid easy detection.

The night-riding behavior suggests the campaign attacking helmet wearing as "imperialism" had some effect. For no laws were passed banning the wearing of helmets. The campaign, to the extent it had some effect on behavior, had its effect through stigma only. And to the extent behavior changed, this indicated that to some degree the Soviet government succeeded in stigmatizing those who wore white helmets.

Lessig cites no sources whatsoever for the above story. So I am looking for more credible sources/information as to whether there was ever any such anti-helmet campaign in the Soviet Union.

  • 9
    Considering that since 1967, wearing helmet has been mandatory in USSR (only 6 years after such a law was first introduced in Australia), looks false to me. Will do a bit more research and maybe post an answer if I find anything definitive. – sashkello Nov 07 '17 at 00:44
  • 7
    *"Because helmets were produced only in the West"*... this is where I call "nonsense" on the text. The Soviet Union did not shy away from copying any and all kinds of technology, from nuclear bombs to supersonic aircraft. Saying that the Soviet Union would rather ban the use of helmets rather than make their own brand of helmets in order to avoid importing helmets reeks of utter nonsense. –  Nov 07 '17 at 13:29
  • May I suggest to include the next paragraph from Lessig's article ("Soon after this campaign reached its apex, ...") in the quote? It may suggest that the campaign was relatively short-lived. – default locale Nov 07 '17 at 18:03
  • 2
    Here is a video from 1943: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-sMBehwNq8 and at least some of the cyclists are wearing helmets. This limits the scope of the question to the surge of cartoons against western-style (white?) helmets. – default locale Nov 07 '17 at 18:29
  • http://thevintagent.com/2017/07/02/anke-eve-goldmann-soviet-racing-women/ Has a photo of russian women in a road race wearing white helmets sometime around 1949. – Adam Nov 07 '17 at 23:20
  • 1
    @sashkello a 1969 or 1970 Soviet article says "But the lack of helmets has made it impossible to make them compulsory in many cities and republics" https://books.google.com/books?id=bksvAAAAMAAJ&q=%22+lack+of+helmets+has+made+it+impossible+%22&dq=%22+lack+of+helmets+has+made+it+impossible+%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjgseSG_q7XAhUIMSYKHdm-C-cQ6AEIJzAA – DavePhD Nov 08 '17 at 12:31
  • 1
    @DavePhD Yes, there are lots of sources directly contradicting each other. Russian wikipedia says 1967, but links to a dead webpage. Probably was moved here: http://www.gibdd.ru/about/history/ This is official Russian Traffic Police webpage, and places the ban in 60's. I have a feeling that there was an older version of this webpage which has been edited, as some regional GIBDD pages do have slightly altered similar quote, which says 1967. This is where this information originates. I wasn't able to find the full text of the actual document it mentions. – sashkello Nov 09 '17 at 03:44
  • @DavePhD Not sure what that book says exactly, as it cuts off mid-sentence. The document wikipedia refers to is for Russian Soviet Republic, not all-Soviet, so that book might be talking about impossibility to apply it to all of USSR, that would be my guess... – sashkello Nov 09 '17 at 03:51
  • @sashkello The book doesn't really say more on that topic. The book continues "...compulsory in many cities and republics. One-tenth of all accidents occur because of poor road signs. There is a shortage of these signs; therefore, they are produced hastily..." – DavePhD Nov 09 '17 at 13:57
  • @sashkello but the article in the book starts by saying how many accidents there were in 1969 specifically in "the Russian Republic" – DavePhD Nov 09 '17 at 17:20
  • @DavePhD I see. Well, that just makes two seemingly authoritative sources being in direct disagreement. – sashkello Nov 09 '17 at 22:34
  • I know in the 60s, jeans and western appeal was frowned upon behind the Iron Curtain, to the point where you could get arrested for wearing them in public. So in that sense I can see how a particular type of helmet might be "prohibited" if it was seen as "capitalist" influence. For example something inspired by "The wild one" would certainly not be tolerated (even though I'm fairly certain no helmets were worn in that movie what so ever). – ventsyv Nov 10 '17 at 21:45

0 Answers0