31

Journalist Daniel Bergner explains in this video, 99% of What We Believe About Female Sexuality is Nonsense, that there is a common misconception about the sexuality of the genders:

the idea that while men are genetically programmed to spread their limitless seed and be promiscuous that women by contrast are genetically programmed, evolutionary scripted to seek out one good man, seek out one good provider, seek out closeness and constancy and so that at least relatively speaking by this theory women are somewhat better suited to monogamy, have a sex drive that’s a bit less raw, a bit less animalistic than male libido.

He argues against this proposition, by referring to a study where women's stated subjective sexual responses to erotic scenarios didn't match the objective measurement of blood flow to their genitals - in particular, they were more aroused by the idea of sex with strangers over sex with close friends than they admitted.

By itself, this isn't sufficient to overthrow the more common understanding.

Is there evidence that men are/are not genetically programmed to seek multiple sexual partners more so than women?

Oddthinking
  • 140,378
  • 46
  • 548
  • 638
Fawzy Hegab
  • 1,101
  • 1
  • 9
  • 10
  • I fixed the title, however it would be better to focus the question on a single claim. – Sklivvz Jan 07 '16 at 01:14
  • 6
    No pseudo-answers in the comments, please. If you have an answer, use the answer box, where they can be properly assessed. – Oddthinking Jan 11 '16 at 05:11
  • 2
    "The popular theory is". [Citation Needed] " men are more likely want more than a woman" [Citation Needed]. "men tend more to polygamy. This story is very popular (at least I hear it a lot!)." Not a notable claim. And so on throughout the post. Do you have any substantial and **notable** claim for us to examine other than blatant gender stereotyping? –  Sep 09 '18 at 20:21
  • @MichaelK - Honestly, at this point I think that the "more tuned to long-term relationships" bit *is* popular enough to have notability by sheer mass. We do still allow that one, right? – Ben Barden Sep 09 '18 at 20:24
  • 2
    What does "more tuned to" mean? And in any case: what would the **cause** of that alleged "tuning" be? Social pressure, genetic disposition, or a mix? Maybe women by evolution are **more** prone to break monogamy than men but **social conventions** have forced them to act against their nature? But this is impossible to tell, and **popular opinion** on the subject is an entirely useless tool when it comes to determining that. All in all: this question is unanswerable. –  Sep 09 '18 at 20:27
  • 1
    The video offers nothing that enables a objective comparison to women's "suitability" for monogamy vs men's. It just reports on one measure of female sexual arousal, with no similar measure for male sexual arousal, and it does nothing to relate that to "suitability" for monogamy (which certainly involves other factors besides sexual arousal). There is no "notable claim", at least not one that is in any way coherent. – Daniel R Hicks Sep 10 '18 at 00:47
  • Thats the popular theory? – Jamie Clinton Sep 12 '18 at 00:21
  • Consider: Are humans "genetically programmed" to be omnivores? Some people stick religiously to a vegetarian diet, and others to a "paleo" diet, while most settle for the moderate middle. Each claims to be "good for you". But when you examine the evolutionary "logic" behind the fact of human omnivorism you find that the ability to have such a varied diet is good for survival -- a human can survive purely on walrus meat, or potatoes, or quail eggs. This doesn't imply anything about quail eggs being the "right" human diet. Similarly with human sexuality -- possible doesn't mean "preferred". – Daniel R Hicks Sep 14 '18 at 01:35
  • How would this question even be answered? What would constitute strong evidence that couldn't be claimed to be a result of culture? – piojo Sep 14 '18 at 05:00
  • It seems dubious that you would get a representative sample by surveying the kind of people who are willing to answer questions about their sexual preferences while medical instruments are strapped on their genitalia... – Tgr Sep 24 '18 at 04:47

1 Answers1

4

The quote in the original question seems like a misappropriation of Bateman's principle. Bateman asserted that females in general (regardless of species) will be more selective of mate quality than males. This doesn't exactly mean that they are more monogamous, just that they are more "choosy".

As the Wikipedia article on this topic explains at length, the evidence for Bateman's principle is mixed at best. And it's worth nothing that Bateman's own research focused on fruit flies, not humans. But here is an interesting cross-cultural study of human populations which concludes:

Men not only posses a greater desire than women do for a variety of sexual partners, men also require less time to elapse than women do before consenting to sexual intercourse, and men tend to more actively seek short-term mateships than women do.

(David Schmitt, "Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Test from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003)

I'm not sure if these findings have been replicated by other studies, but they do support Bateman's principle as applied to humans.

paradisi
  • 2,201
  • 1
  • 22
  • 25
Brian Z
  • 7,194
  • 1
  • 29
  • 48