I know that there are a lot of studies out there that claim that organic food is not significantly different than nonorganic food in nutritional content, but this new study seems to challenge this claim.
Is this study legitimate? It is a meta-analysis, and uses many peer reviewed papers to come to it's conclusions, but are the methods correct? It just seems surprising to me, since the consensus seemed to be that organic food and nonorganic food are not significantly different, and this is not new research, but a meta-analysis, so how did it come to a different conclusion than the consensus?