Just to laugh some more, they also show this: http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2011/ Talk about blatantly skewed-up statistics...
– nicoFeb 17 '14 at 07:32
3
it wouldn't surprise me, but a lot depends on your sample set. There's for example software that doesn't require a license, include that and your numbers go up. From my experience in the industry, the numbers differ greatly also between private and commercial use, with far more private users electing to use pirated software than do commercial entities. And in companies, it's far more likely that there's accidental use beyond licensed numbers than deliberate (company buys 100 licenses, poor bookkeeping causes them to not notice they have 120 installed copies).
– jwentingFeb 17 '14 at 08:28
Just off the top of my head, it seems this figure must either ignore or significantly underestimate the amount of free licensed software installed by everyone. Just as a ratio on a single computer (you absolutely can't take into account Android, IOs, etc., and be anywhere near that 1/5 figure,) there are drastically more licenced/free programs installed compared to the handful of possible unlicensed ones.
– Garrett FogerlieFeb 21 '14 at 18:17
1
In summary, although the count of unlicensed pieces of software is hard, the count of licensed pieces is harder to define, let alone quantify.
– Mark HurdFeb 24 '14 at 02:20
What's your definition of "piece of software"? When I have an operating system which comes with 100 utility programs, does it count as one licensed/unlicensed software or as 101? And what about software which doesn't require a license? Does that also count as "unlicensed"?
– PhilippApr 11 '15 at 09:48
@GarrettFogerlie "free licensed software" is still licensed... We're talking about software used in violation of its license, iow stolen/pirated software.
– jwentingApr 14 '15 at 05:57