Is the famous image of a face on Mars a trick of the light or an artificial structure reprinting a face?
-
Unfortunately not. When you look at even the original pictures in 3D it's clearly a rock. – Jan 20 '13 at 18:28
2 Answers
No, it's just a myth. That picture had a low resolution and a particular light angle made it look like a face, but see this:
Here's what it looks like from the oblique:
It's clearly not a face.
What the picture actually shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa -- landforms common around the American West. "It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho," says Garvin. "That's a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars."
--source
The Face on Mars and Pareidolia
We have a habit of finding patterns were there are none (Pareidolia):
... with our knowledge of pareidolia, and the high resolution images provided by NASA, do you think the Face is still a face, or an optical illusion enhanced by the fact that we were originally looking at very low resolution images?
The Badlands Guardian in Alberta, Canada, discovered through "Google Earth".

- 47,851
- 18
- 213
- 208
-
5
-
@fredley: in case you're being serious, the lamp isn't a face. Pareidolia isn't just for faces, it's about "seeing" anything in a picture other than what the picture is showing. The lamp is slightly more rude example - clue: legs. – TessellatingHeckler Mar 24 '11 at 21:51
-
8Actually, it's not a lamp. http://ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view/1042108 – anthony137 Mar 24 '11 at 23:10
-
-
@Nick T: the earphone (or oil well and track, to be more precise) were there before the aerial photograph – Henry Mar 25 '11 at 06:27
-
funny thing, if you add those to google's picasa it will probably pick all of them as a face and ask you to name them. – cregox Mar 26 '11 at 23:28