I just ragequitted GitHub.
I'm considering between hosting my own issues tracker, or embrace any of gitlab.com, Bitbucket, Sourcehut, etc.
I sorta think either gitlab or trac would be nice, and I couldn't ask which one to choose, in order to avoid opinion polling. However there's some thing... I would really want to use as little persistent storage as possible.
Do you have any data or intuition about relative gitlab "expectable" size bloat relative to trac? (I mean, trac is older, so it's sensible to think it would have somewhat a lower persistent storage footprint) Or gitlab figures relative to any other similar software, or trac figures relative to any other similar software.