0

I am referring to the documentation here and running JBoss as Windows as Service. I am not sure why it doesn't runs on localhost:9090 as mentioned in the documentation but on localhost:9990. I don't see anything related to port 9990 in standalone.xml file. Also, the page I get is different as compared with the screenshot in the documentation:

enter image description here

John
  • 145
  • 8
  • John, what's the _actual_ question here? – alexus Jun 16 '16 at 14:40
  • @alexus Why it doesn't runs on port 9090 as mentioned in the documentation screenshot? – John Jun 16 '16 at 14:41
  • why? seems like documentation is a bit outdated, but feel free to reconfigure it to any port you like) – alexus Jun 16 '16 at 14:44
  • So you mean it should be 9990 only always and not 9090? – John Jun 16 '16 at 14:44
  • it doesn't really matter if it's 9990, 9090, 9443, 9999, 8009 etc – alexus Jun 16 '16 at 14:45
  • @alexus I don't really see the port 9990 listed any where in the `standalone.xml` for my jBoss. I am wondering how `localhost:9990` is letting me access the console for jBoss. When I try to use other ports, it doesn't work. Do you think I should be making an entry in the file for port 9990? – John Jun 17 '16 at 19:02

0 Answers0