I have a KVM host (at 192.168.0.10
) that currently has one working KVM guest (at 192.168.0.12
). On attempting to install a new KVM guest today, I reached a problem where the network on the new guest only partially works.
The only things I can access from the new guest are resources inside the network. Trying to access any other network resources (including those past the gateway) results in 100% packet loss to the destination.
The guests connect through a bridge at br0
that uses eth2
to access the network.
The host network works as expected, and the network on the other (only one, currently) guest, also connecting through the same bridge, works. Shutting down the working guest does not fix the problem.
Both of the guests get their network details over DHCP.
Running tcpdump
from the host on the virtual interface for the guest shows the guest attempting to communicate with the outside world, and only getting responses from the host and the gateway.
Host
The guest with the problem is currently connecting through vnet0
.
# ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 00:1e:4f:34:dc:79 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 00:1e:4f:34:dc:7b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br0 state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 00:15:17:6a:fb:ee brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
13: br0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
link/ether 00:15:17:6a:fb:ee brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.0.10/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global br0
inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe6a:fbee/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
24: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br0 state UNKNOWN qlen 500
link/ether fe:54:00:fc:0f:07 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fefc:f07/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
25: vnet1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master br0 state UNKNOWN qlen 500
link/ether fe:54:00:89:8e:17 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc54:ff:fe89:8e17/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
# ip route
default via 192.168.0.202 dev br0
192.168.0.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.10
# cat /etc/network/interfaces
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports eth2
bridge_stp off
bridge_maxwait 0
bridge_fd 0
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.0015176afbee no eth2
vnet0
vnet1
Non-working guest
Note that the non-working guest uses busybox ip
.
# ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisk pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 52:54:00:fc:0f:07 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.0.27/24 scope global eth0
inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fefc:f07/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
# ip route
default via 192.168.0.202 dev eth0
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 src 192.168.0.27
Working guest
# ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 52:54:00:89:8e:17 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.0.12/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth0
inet6 fe80::5054:ff:fe89:8e17/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
# ip route
default via 192.168.0.202 dev eth0
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.12
Both the host and the guests run Debian Wheezy.
I do not see any misconfiguration in the details posted, especially bearing in mind that the exact same setup method worked recently to install the other KVM guest (and continues to work even now). What could be the cause of this problem, and how can I fix it?