1

I have been playing around with a VM trying to install Gentoo, and it seems there are two options for my Master Boot Record : DOS and Solaris.

What is the difference? Which should I choose, or are there situations which I would prefer one over the other?

Thunder3
  • 347
  • 2
  • 5

2 Answers2

4

I believe the difference is that DOS uses the IBM Standard Master Boot Record format defined by IBM back in the early 80's (and is the reason for the 2TB max-disk size we have), and Solaris uses the newer EFI standard. IIRC, Apple also uses EFI-style partitioning. Windows Dynamic Disks use EFI as well.

DOS-format has by far the most support from commodity PC motherboard BIOS. EFI is a better standard, in that it is more future proof, but adoption isn't that great yet. There are two problems with the old DOS format; one is the 2TB max volume size I mentioned already, and the second is that some operating systems have a maximum partition count. That number is 16 or higher in most cases, so most folk should never run into it.

sysadmin1138
  • 133,124
  • 18
  • 176
  • 300
1

Solaris uses 2 different types of partitioning depending on the version of Solaris and on the size of the disk being partitioned. Solaris 9 and later use EFI partition tables because they have a 64-bit address field. All other versions use date structures similar to the BSD disk label.

fpmurphy
  • 841
  • 6
  • 13
  • Is there a difference? Will the BSD type restrict me to 2TB? Are there other considerations? Btw, thanks for your very technical answer :) +1 – Thunder3 Jul 19 '09 at 03:54