0

I routinely see the following in the logs of a DB2 LUW 9.7.4 server:

-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 11:20 S0000045.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 12:10 S0000046.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 13:05 S0000047.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 13:47 S0000048.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 14:40 S0000049.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 14:50 S0000050.LOG
-rw------- 1 db2inst1 db2iadm1 129M Feb 23 14:40 S0000051.LOG

As you can see, log 50 has been written to after log 51 has. If log 51 is no longer the newest, as a secondary log, shouldn't it be deleted?

benjarrell
  • 188
  • 1
  • 8

1 Answers1

0

Well this means that one of you apps was holding S0000050.LOG for 10 sec longer than S0000051.LOG ..

Jags
  • 1
  • 1