I know it's not what you want to hear, or indeed what you asked, but Fedora 5 is extremely old and well out of patch. If I had inherited it, I would be making very strenuous moves to get functionality off that and on to a supportable system.
And the mod_ssl
issue may be just what you need to get the migration done. If you come at this from the point of view of "If I need to recompile apache, there may be significant downtime, as there will be each time I have to recompile it in future so that our web server stays in patch; but if we bite the bullet now and move to a modern platform, where our web server is packaged, keeping in patch becomes really easy", you may be able to sell the move.
If, however, you just knuckle under and do what you're asked to do, with minimal discomfort for the users, noone will ever see a good reason to swallow the downtime and disruption of a platform move.
Seriously, a Fedora 5 box is just begging to be compromised, at this point. By way of example, apache 2.2 is now at 2.2.17, and while your OpenSSL (which underlies mod_ssl) is at 0.9.8a, the current version in that stream is 0.9.8r.
But if, as usually happens, this story is unacceptable - despite being true - and you're right that you're running apache 2.2.2-1.3, which was the last version released as part of the F5 upgrade stream, the corresponding mod_ssl package can be found in the fedora project archives, and you should be able to yum
that in with minimal disruption and downtime. But be very clearly aware of what you're doing if you decide to go with it.