What web application firewall do you use? I'm primarily interested in something I can deploy on the perimeter that can protect multiple Apache and IIS servers, but I'd like to hear all answers. Tell me a little bit about how many servers it protects, what kind of load, performance, price. Basically anything you want to share.
2 Answers
Having said I have no experience in using Mod Security, I like to share the following review:
ModSecurity is an open source web application firewall (WAF) engine for Apache that is developed by Trustwave's SpiderLabs. It has a robust event-based programming language which provides protection from a range of attacks against web applications and allows for HTTP traffic monitoring, logging and real-time analysis. With over 10,000 deployments world-wide, ModSecurity is the most widely deployed WAF in existence.
It operates embedded into the web server, acting as a powerful umbrella – shielding applications from attacks. ModSecurity supports both branches of the Apache web server.
The module filters, and optionally rejects, incoming requests based on a number of different criteria like CGI variables, HTTP headers, environment variables, and even individual script parameters. mod_security can also create an audit log, storing full request details in a separate file, including POST payloads (the audit feature can be turned on or off on a per-server or per-directory basis).
Advantage
The advantage of mod_security is “security”.
- No network side configuration
- Easy management.
- Free as in Beer
- HTTP intrusion detection and prevention
Disadvantages
- You have to become a security expert
- You have to become a protocol expert.
- The configuration must be done manually.
- Performance degradation

- 314
- 2
- 4
- 12
The Barracuda Web Application Firewall provides a good browser based management/configuration UI which can be setup by most admins which are comfortable setting up IIS or Apache, with just reading their documentation. I know it works with IIS and Apache servers as I've used it with both, and it should work with any server which follows the HTTP/HTTPS standards. We have it deployed as a VM, but you can also buy it as an appliance, or their are even cloud based deployment models. For us, it defends 23 servers hitting only about 20% of it's CPU capacity during our current peaks. It add only single digit ms to the latency.
The main advantage I see compared to Imperva's product is:
- Quicker to configure
- Less likely to need to hire vendors professional services, as most knowledable web server admins with just a little reading of the product documentation can configure it, while with Imperva, a greater percentage of people will need to hire their professional services to configure it.
Sorry, can't compare to mod_security as I've never used it.

- 543
- 3
- 9