2

I'm in the process of researching solutions for a new network location rollout.

We are going to have two providers one on 100mbit and 50mbit commits..

I'm wondering what linux solution i could build that could handle that much traffic.

and also how it stacks up against say a Cisco 2821 with upgraded RAM..

user56579
  • 21
  • 2

3 Answers3

2

linux box on a decent hardware can handle traffic of few hundreds mbit/s without problems.

for bgp under linux there is not much choice - quagga.

pQd
  • 29,981
  • 6
  • 66
  • 109
  • 1
    Are people still using BIRD (http://bird.network.cz/) ? – Tom O'Connor Oct 08 '10 at 22:33
  • @Tom O'Connor - only production installations of bgp routing under linux that i saw were based on quagga. – pQd Oct 09 '10 at 06:53
  • @TomO'Connor oh yes, usage of BIRD is quite heavy, take a look at this: https://www.euro-ix.net/documents/1024-Euro-IX-IXP-Report-pdf – Marek Sebera Nov 24 '12 at 15:06
  • Archive of above PDF: https://web.archive.org/web/20140525195833/https://www.euro-ix.net/documents/1024-Euro-IX-IXP-Report-pdf – NiKiZe Aug 15 '21 at 14:39
0

PFSense. It's FreeBSD not Linux, but if it's just a dedicated router machine, shouldn't really matter.

Mark Henderson
  • 68,823
  • 31
  • 180
  • 259
0

I'm not sure why pQd said that there's no choice for BGP routing. Personally I heard about Zebra but never about quagga...

Hubert Kario
  • 6,361
  • 6
  • 36
  • 65
  • 1
    quagga forked [de-facto] dead code of zebra project. see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quagga_%28software%29#Name – pQd Oct 09 '10 at 19:31