8

Update 6/4/ 2017: I am so happy that the ID "Eryngium prostratum – Creeping Eryngo" was found by Lorel C., and am awarding her the bounty. I also wish that that people could please vote for Christy B.'s answer. She was very close. This plant actually turned out to be in the Eryngium genus, after all! Thank you all so much for your time and research. I appreciate ALL of the answers. Even answers that were off base helped to rule things out, as I added more info and pictures. I don't know why people "downvoted" two answers on my post. That discourages people from trying to help in the future! Please stop doing that. Thanks again, all!

You can see my original post below with the updates, and the four added pictures above the 5th and 6th pics that I had initially posted without size reference (which caused confusion):

"This tiny blue/purple flower is growing in my friend's meadow in the Richmond area of Virginia in the eastern USA. She says it has roots (not corms or bulbs)."

UPDATE: I added more pics below. The leaves that go with the flower are not the three-leaved ones, as she had told me before. I apologize for any confusion this has caused. It definitely has roots (she pulled one up). She said that the leaves were hidden beneath the other leaves. It seems to be low-creeping in habit, and is pretty widespread in this meadow. She also informed me that it mostly grows in the moister areas of the meadow that do not drain as quickly as the rest because they are lower lying. It's growing in full sun, and not near the tree line.

(Photos by Sharon McGeein)

Neither answer below is correct. But, I "liked" them for trying, anyway. Thank you.

Update: Unfortunately, I do not think that the third offered answer is along the right lines, either. (I so wish that it was!) I can't find anything in the Sanguisorba genus (let alone the Rosaceae family) that has similar stems or leaves, at all.

At this point, I think that finding the correct ID may need to be based on the leaves and stems, rather than the miniscule flowers. I don't think that you will find other pictures of these flowers out there on the internet. (I haven't found any after extensive searching.) I doubt that it is a rare plant. It's just that the flowers are so tiny (less than 1/4 inch big) that most people probably would not notice them, or take pictures.

blue flower- Photo by Sharon McGeein blue flower- Photo by Sharon McGeein blue flower- Photo by Saron McGeein blue flower- Photo by Sharon McGeein blue flower- Photo by Sharon McGeeinblue flower- Photo by Sharon McGeein

Diane
  • 1,121
  • 7
  • 19
  • Has this picture been taken very recently? – Bamboo May 26 '17 at 22:38
  • @Bamboo- Yes. Within the last week. She said that the three leaves belonged to this flower. She apparently knows the ID of what the other ones in the pic are. This is a new one, to her. – Diane May 27 '17 at 00:20
  • New one to me too, I'll keep looking when I can, I'm intrigued for one thing... just how small is the flower in terms of inches or centimetres? – Bamboo May 27 '17 at 00:39
  • @ Bamboo- I am also intrigued! I hope to have an answer tomorrow about the size. It frustrates me when friends send me pics with no size reference, and ask for ID. I believe that it was very tiny. Hopefully, she can find this one again, and take better pics. I assumed that it was spread by corms or tiny bulbs, and asked her specifically about that, as well as the leaves. Also asked her to dig one up to check about that. (But, she hasn't, as of yet.) She owns a farm, and seems to know what she has growing everywhere. – Diane May 27 '17 at 01:26
  • If your words split, just leave them like that and one of us will fix them. If you get an error message when pictures won't post, tell us what it is. If they post sideways, or you want to change the order, we can walk you through fixing them or do it for you. If you post them somewhere else, like a Google album, we can download them from there. We also have a great Gardening & Landscaping Chat room. Helpful people are always there or will come, including stormy and Bamboo. That's where I learned everything I know! You've already been a big help in your time here, don't forget that! – Sue Saddest Farewell TGO GL May 28 '17 at 17:55
  • Diane, I tried fixing the pictures here. Are they all there? Is there anything else you need me to do with them? Also, I brought the picture in from your web link in [this answer](https://gardening.stackexchange.com/a/25254/7305). I hope that helped! – Sue Saddest Farewell TGO GL May 28 '17 at 18:01
  • @ Sue- Sweet! Thank you so much! I really appreciate it. I also wish that I knew how to add a photo credit to my friend Sharon McGeein. She absolutely loved it when I told her that her photo from this site came up on an internet search. (It's famous! lol ) It showed up when I Googled "Meadow plant in Virginia with tiny purple blossoms", in images. (It is the 4th pic in this post) It shows up in the 5th pic in images in the Google search. But, it reads "blue flower-blue flower", because I didn't know what I was doing on the picture description. I would be so grateful if you could credit her. – Diane May 28 '17 at 22:33
  • @Sue- I just edited to add more info. I'm getting the hang of it now. ;) I tried editing my image descriptions to include her name. But, it still shows up as blue flower- blue flower on an internet search, so I guess that isn't possible. Thanks again. – Diane May 28 '17 at 23:22
  • @Sue- Oh wow! You fixed my geranium answer from way back when, too! Awesome. – Diane May 28 '17 at 23:32
  • I have asked a few friends and nobody knows for sure, but I have received two suggestions, Echeveria and Sedum. Unfortunately I don't have the patience of looking at each variety or cultivar. A member of this site posted this link some time ago, maybe you'll find it useful: http://www.sedumphotos.net/main.php – Alina May 31 '17 at 14:57
  • @Alina Thank you so much! I will check that out later and let you know. If that leads anywhere, I will ask you to post it as an answer. :) – Diane May 31 '17 at 17:51
  • 1
    While researching an answer to your question, I came across this amazing website ["Virginia Wildflowers"](https://virginiawildflowers.org/about/) run by Gloria. I looked through her website but could find no clue to an answer. However, Gloria might be happy to receive an email from you? In the meantime I'll keep researching... – andrewbuilder Jun 02 '17 at 00:54
  • @andrewbuilder- Thank you! I will check it out. – Diane Jun 02 '17 at 13:32
  • @andrewbuilder- Unfortunately, there is nothing on that website that resembles this. However, I may try e-mailing Gloria in hopes that she can help. – Diane Jun 02 '17 at 23:52
  • @Alina- This is not a cultivar in the Echeveria family. But, thank you for trying to help with the ID. – Diane Jun 02 '17 at 23:55
  • @Diane You might have just given this site some major caffeine. Whoa. I am not able to let this go either! I've got questions out there on other sites and obviously some of these new guys are helping with the ID. This is so much fun! What a super question...do not give in and tell anyone if you know what this is! I am out in 'wetlands weeds' big time. Amazing the proliferation of native species not to mention the exotics and how they are taking over. Purple Loose strife is still top list of exotics for...40 years or more. I love this! Thank you again, Diane and Sharon!! – stormy Jun 03 '17 at 20:22
  • I am laughing so hard!! Please, people do not go search for Sea Holly in Wet Meadows!! I obviously have to take a break!!!! – stormy Jun 03 '17 at 20:58

5 Answers5

9

Even though I am no type of botanist, I can't resist a good puzzle. So I decided to look into http://www.wildflowersearch.com and came up with "creeping eryngo" or Eryngium prostratum

Eryngium prostratum Note those wild looking sepals.

Now I do see that Christy B. has already proposed a sea holly, and others thought it couldn't be Eryngium at all because of the spikiness of most of those plants. However reading descriptions of E. prostratum, I feel Christy B. is on the right track. But this Eryngium looks like a softer, gentler species than the rest of them.

I confess I have never seen this plant at all but I found some more pictures of it on internet for example: https://bwwellsassociation.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/fall-wildflowers-at-rockcliff-farm/

E.prostratum at Rockcliff Farm

See the fleshy leaves approx. the correct shape? It looks like the little flowers start out white, & turn purple later. The folks at Rockcliff Farm describe it like this on their website: "Along the water’s edge were small colonies of one of the toughest plants at Falls Lake – Eryngium prostratum – Creeping Eryngo. It grows at the water’s edge, where it is battered by the waves generated by passing boats, dried and roasted by the sun when the water level drops, and submerged for days or weeks when the water level is too high. It responds by blooming 7 months of the year, from July to January. This plant is easy to miss – blooms are very small, about 1/4 in long, and the leaves are the size of a penny."

....So that's my guess. Eryngium prostratum.

Lorel C.
  • 3,639
  • 1
  • 13
  • 20
  • Amazing pictures , looks like a match to me! Is there a chance this is a hybrid as well? – Christy B. Jun 04 '17 at 18:48
  • 1
    Wonderful! Looks like a match to me, too! Thank you sooo much, Lorel C. And thank you, Christy B., for being on the right track. lol Now we OCD types can sleep at night. ;) – Diane Jun 04 '17 at 20:04
  • 2
    Bravo, Lorel!! I had been searching through online wildflower ID sites but had to put my search aside to care for my elderly mom. When I came back today to resume it, I noticed new photos and was happy the OP had better ones to show ...until I realised it was your answer. Very well done. I love a good plant puzzle/mystery. If I ever get stuck, I know who to ask. ;) – Jude Jun 05 '17 at 00:23
  • Right?! This had me stumped too, and it's funny you @Diane mentioned lack of sleep BC I hop on the exchange when I can't sleep. I did an image match search at work and couldn't even find as good of a comparison. It's about time! :) So, after all this, is your friend in VA keeping these, and figuring out proper care for it, or pulling them, or just letting them grow wild in the meadow? – Christy B. Jun 05 '17 at 04:52
  • @ChristyB. lol I doubt that she is going to kill it, after she named it "Shari Lou Blue", for lack of an ID. She was thrilled to find out what it is! I don't know if she plans to do anything with it other than let it grow where it is, for now. She has very little spare time on her hands (between working and running a farm, etc.) which is why I was trying to help her out. I'll let you know if that changes. – Diane Jun 05 '17 at 19:16
6

It looks likes the beginnings of blue Hobbit stikle

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

Christy B.
  • 1,195
  • 2
  • 11
  • 14
  • Christy B. - Unfortunately, this plant is not a type of Eryngium planum (also known as Sea Holly), including the Blue Hobbit variety. The prickly leaves and stems of that are very different than those of this tiny flower. But, I do appreciate your trying to solve this mystery. – Diane Jun 02 '17 at 23:37
  • 1
    Christy's ID is pretty amazing. Mind blowing...unbelievable. I gave her a vote! – stormy Jun 03 '17 at 20:44
  • 1
    I've added pics above of what the leaves look like when they are sprouts and juveniles. The spikes occur as they mature. Might still be a possibility??? Check out the jags next to your ruler pic – Christy B. Jun 03 '17 at 20:57
  • I was downvoted. I find this discouraging for those who are trying to help. Someone with 79,000+ rep was downvoted too, and obviously has experience and is knowledgeable. So far everyone is guessing, and putting in their input to help, not to be stupid or put "false info" on the site. I'd like the person downvoting to post the correct answer. – Christy B. Jun 04 '17 at 16:35
  • Christy B.- I am sorry that you were downvoted by someone. It wasn't me. I just voted for you now, and hopefully others will as well, since your ID led to a more conclusive ID. I really do appreciate your help, and hope that other people vote for your answer, too. – Diane Jun 04 '17 at 20:10
  • I edited up up top to ask people to vote for your answer, too. I don't know why people downvote answers, at all! I am grateful for any time and research that anyone puts in. (I don't even downvote answers that are way off base, because at least they help to rule things out.) Yours was so close. I apologize that I did not pursue the Eryngium genus further yesterday. You were definitely on the right track. So, thank you. – Diane Jun 04 '17 at 21:34
  • @stormy- I gave her a vote. Also edited my post up top. I don't like this "downvoting" thing on this site (and edited my post up top to say so). It's like some people think it's a game to throw out other peoples' time, research, and effort to help. And Christy B.'s answer actually led to the correct one. – Diane Jun 04 '17 at 22:05
3

I don't have a conclusive ID for you, but maybe this will help someone else finish the job.

I am convinced this is a member of the Sanguisorba genus.

The leaves, sepals, rhizome, and flower head are very consistent with the Greater Burnet (Sanguisorba officinalis), but differs mostly in color and size. It's closer in size to the small burnet (Sanguisorba minor), but the leaves are too different.

I hope that helps push someone toward your answer. Good Luck!

Silt Loam
  • 116
  • 3
  • Wow, I am so amazed! Love your moniker too! I think you are right...at least the Genus, species!! Thank you! How did you find this? Did you use a dichotomous key? My brain thanks you, too!! – stormy May 30 '17 at 19:32
  • Silt Loam- Thank you for your suggestion. I researched everything in the Sanguisorba genus, as well as everything in the Rosaceae family after you posted your answer. But, there are no matches for the miniscule flowers, let alone the leaves. I'm thinking that the leaves and stem may be more important for ID than the flowers, since there are probably no pics of these miniscule flowers out there on the internet. I would normally "Like" (upvote) your answer because I really do appreciate your trying. But, I don't know if that will take my offered bounty of off my post. Not sure how that works. – Diane May 31 '17 at 01:58
  • No worries about upvoting. I did start with a dichotomous key. I agree, I went through all the Sanguisorba and browsed around Rosaceae, but really couldn't make a match. It's entirely possible that it's a cultivar that somehow ended up there. Do you know if this plant is really wide spread? – Silt Loam May 31 '17 at 17:15
  • Well, kudos to you Silt Loam! I wish I had my old tome. These internet dichotomous keys are awkward. Which one do you use? – stormy Jun 03 '17 at 17:06
2

How sure are you that the trifoliate leaves belong to this flower? It's just the flower resembles Pontederia lanceolata, see here https://www.rightplants4me.co.uk/content/plant?PlantID=2830&Pontederia= but that does not have leaves like the ones in your picture, and usually flowers later in the season.

Pontederia has the common name of Pickerel weed and is usually found in damp meadows or near water. I'm not 100% sure it's that, but its pretty similar.

Bamboo
  • 131,823
  • 3
  • 72
  • 162
  • why has this suggestion been downvoted, yet the Hyacinth ID has not? Whatever this plant may be, its certainly not a hyacinth. I bet I can guess who did it... – Bamboo May 26 '17 at 22:12
  • Oh I am in giggles. I think you are right, Bamboo! Who the heck would be audacious to down vote YOU? This is why I think there should be a simple line as to WHY the downvote. Just like when we edit our answers we are asked why, this would be so much more help for those that spend time and brain cells making answers. We are supposed to learn from our mistakes as well, and my goodness what a great catch for ID! This is definitely a weakness in this site! How often do you get down votes Bamboo? J. Musser has zero. Unbelievable! – stormy May 26 '17 at 23:38
  • I do not think that this ID is correct. But, I will give it a vote anyway, to negate the negative vote from someone (not me). lol Even incorrect answers help rule things out, in my opinion. ;) – Diane May 27 '17 at 00:45
  • @Diane - it isn't correct, this plant is in flower now, and Pontederia flowers later.. but so far its as near as I've got. That looks like a spent head in one of the pics, behind the flower - does your friend know if the seed capsules colour up, like small berries, and if so, red or black? – Bamboo May 27 '17 at 00:52
  • @stormy I've had a few downvotes in my time, the odd one here and there fair enough, the others not. After all, I am female, its only to be expected, unfortunately... – Bamboo May 27 '17 at 00:54
1

Well I am going to go ahead and ID this flower as a Hyacinth. You should be able to transplant these guys to another bed this fall so that you can appreciate them better. They are a bulb plant, someone must have planted them long ago?

hyacinth

(source)

Amending my answer although pnuts was the first to say it; Water Hyacinth, couldn't find that tight pre flower flower but the leaves and marsh and what not, this must be correct or at least closer.

water hyacinth

(source)

Still not totally convinced. This would be a water plant adapting to the meadow. That would mean no floating bulb. This just might be a new species or variety?

Glorfindel
  • 265
  • 1
  • 3
  • 11
stormy
  • 40,098
  • 3
  • 31
  • 75
  • 1
    There are other plants that perhaps she thought these flowers belonged to...I am never certain IDing stuff by pictures. Just could not imagine another flower like this at this time of year and if you look closely the proper leaves for hyacinth are there... – stormy May 26 '17 at 20:16
  • 1
    Unless my sense of perspective is shot, no way is this a hyacinth, its way too small.... – Bamboo May 26 '17 at 21:34
  • 1
    Hi stormy! I don't know what flower this is, of course, but Diane said it was not a bulb. That would mean it's not a hyacinth, right? – Sue Saddest Farewell TGO GL May 26 '17 at 23:42
  • 1
    There are at least 2 different plants in that picture. I didn't put much credibility in 'not a bulb'. My problem was scale. You know, looking at other sites off SE, when someone asks a question they've got a mini questionaire...to help ask questions before submitting a question...such as what zone one lives in, how to provide a picture and please provide scale in your picture. We really need that. I am wrong and Bamboo is right and she got down voted? Truly down voting needs to give some explanation so that 'trolls' don't spend their own votes down voting others. I mean...Bamboo? – stormy May 26 '17 at 23:52
  • 1
    It is definitally not a grape hyacinth! I have them in my gardens in VA. I was pretty specific in the info provided. I will ask her for a close up pic. – Diane May 27 '17 at 00:27
  • @stormy- lol I voted hers up to negate the down vote (which was not done by me). Even if I don't feel that either ID is correct, I appreciate people trying. And, it gives us things to maybe rule out. I will ask her for better pics, since people are doubting about the leaves, bulbs, etc. I'm also voting yours up. – Diane May 27 '17 at 00:54
  • My goodness adding the ruler into this picture just floors me. Unbelievably tiny....such a great example to ask for scale! wow! – stormy May 28 '17 at 02:00
  • 1
    @stormy- Thank you for your kind response. I told Sharon that we needed a size reference, and I was pretty floored by the flower size, too! She also informed me a little while ago that it mostly grows in the moister areas of the meadow that do not drain as quickly as the rest because they are lower lying. It's in full sun, and not near the tree line. Stormy- I would like to add the above info to my post, if you think it is useful for ID. But, I am leery of scrambling up my post again by trying. If you think that it is relevant, I wonder if you you can edit my post and add the above info? – Diane May 28 '17 at 03:24
  • That is where I went, into the marshes. I think you've done well, Diane. We'll be back tomorrow, someone will nail this ID with what you've given! I've been looking at Speedwell and...interesting project. – stormy May 28 '17 at 04:35
  • I am OCDing this ID, grins. Has this flower changed at all since this picture? Like opened up? – stormy May 28 '17 at 18:31
  • @ stormy- lol I will ask her! I also OCD things like this. She will be so happy if someone knows what it is! She absolutely loved it when I told her that one of her photos from this site came up on an internet search. She said "If they can't find out what it is, I'll claim it as a new species and name it a 'Blue Shari Lou' ". I am hoping that there is a way to give Sharon McGeein photo credit. She is thrilled that her tiny flower is famous! ;) – Diane May 28 '17 at 22:46
  • @Diane So no one has given an answer yet...hey, I've got a major headache (only way my OCD can be regulated) looking for this plant! How funny. My question was if that hard packed little blue nub of a flower has changed at all?? – stormy May 28 '17 at 23:12
  • @ stormy- Hope your headache gets better! I asked her. I'm sure that she will get back to me about that. I did share this site with her tonight, so she that she can hopefully see this post, and read the comments. (I don't know how that works if people are not members.) They did get storms there last night, and I wonder how that will affect the flowering. I am starting to wonder if it might work better to search this one out by the leaves and stems, rather than the tiny flower. I am am wondering if the plant has always been there, but only happened to noticeably flower at this time. – Diane May 29 '17 at 02:48
  • Well, heck, @pnuts. Water hyacinths looks like the correct answer. Has someone answered with that? I am confused. Make it an answer. I went out to look and my goodness sure looks like water hyacinth to me! Were you talking with Sue in chat? Hey good job...was it Sue or you, pnuts? Hey and this one scores big points! – stormy May 29 '17 at 17:58
  • Diane, I am still not sure with water hyacinth. I've got Sharon's pictures posted on other sites (esp. weed cop sites) because this guy is growing on land not floating in water. This has been quite the energizer on our site...thank you! – stormy May 29 '17 at 19:30
  • 1
    stormy, @pnuts is the one who knows about water hyacinths, not me! I'm not that smart! Earlier under this answer I asked you in a comment if having roots instead of bulbs ruled out hyacinth. That comment from pnuts was to let me know hyacinth do have roots, if they're water hyacinth. Thanks for the lesson pnuts! – Sue Saddest Farewell TGO GL May 29 '17 at 22:58
  • 1
    @Sue I am still not sold on water hyacinth. This is a buggar. Pnuts reply with water hyacinth sent me into another rabbit hole...Unbelievable that I couldn't find the exact leaf (with some serration/lobing) and that tiny nub of a flower. But besides Pickerel weed and hyacinth...the roads have been dead ended. I've got questions on other sites and included Sharon's pictures. Terrible OCD. I have to tear myself away to get anything done! – stormy May 29 '17 at 23:04
  • So sorry that I did not see this additional/modified answer sooner. This is not water hyacinth, either. (I personally sold those in a garden center that also sold pond plants and supplies.) But maybe I need to be researching swamp plants that may stray to meadows at this point. I really do wish that there was a way to focus more on the leaves/stems/roots. I do not believe that any ID will be found using the tiny berry-like flower. – Diane Jun 03 '17 at 03:20