1

I recently saw this video and the accompanying article on the New York Times website, which describes cooking a Thanksgiving dinner (including turkey, a crumble, dressing, and a sweet potato gratin) in a 400 degree oven, plus some things on the stove. It made me wonder whether you could apply the same principle to, say, cooking for the whole week on a Sunday morning: set the oven to one temp and just move pans in and out as needed.

So here's the question: what are the limits of what you can do at 400F/200C? I know I can roast meats and veg at that heat. Can you do breads? desserts? casseroles? When is that heat too high to be practical?

Cascabel
  • 58,065
  • 24
  • 178
  • 319
crmdgn
  • 1,572
  • 3
  • 18
  • 31
  • 1
    Honestly, if your goal is to cook for a week in a short period, then trying to do everything in a constant-temperature oven is an unnecessary restriction. You can easily do a couple things at 400, then a couple things at 350, and so on. Also, the NYTimes thing does use the stove, too; I don't think the fixed temperature oven is really so much a principle/restriction as an eye-catching opening. In any case, given all that, you may wish to clarify: is your goal to learn about using *just* the oven, or are you trying to ask something about how to approach cooking a lot in a short period? – Cascabel Nov 27 '17 at 00:59

2 Answers2

2

That temp will cook many, many things with no problems. You would simply have to adjust cooking time. Also, regarding your article and video, many Thanksgiving items are simply casseroles that need to be heated through (other than the turkey), so one temperature makes sense. Speaking more broadly, oven temperatures are wildly inaccurate. So, a setting of 400F is often meaningless, unless you are carefully monitoring your temperature with an oven thermometer placed inside. It would be fairly common for your oven temperature to be significantly (as much as 50 F or more) different from your oven setting. If you have the time and energy, an oven set at 400F could cook things that need a much lower temperature, provided you shuffle your items in and out of the oven with the correct timing. Perhaps not so convenient, if you needed to set a custard in a water bath at a low temperature. You may also be limited in cooking that requires very high heat. For example, while you could bake an edible Neapolitan pizza, on a stone, in a 400F oven, you would simply get a better result in an 550 degree oven (and in less time). So, practically speaking, I think the bottom line is that, with the exception of some specialty items, the limits here are mostly time and convenience, rather than temperature. You could eat well using an oven that only had a 400F setting. I would say 475 - 500F would be less practical, but then again, if you only had one setting, you would adjust your cooking to the heat source.

moscafj
  • 72,382
  • 3
  • 117
  • 207
1

Preparations that will need very close attention, and probably covering (eg with tinfoil or strategically placed bakeware) from direct heat, at 200°C:

  • Any material (dough, thick sauce...) having a substantial amount (say, more than 5% by weight) of sugar and exposed directly to oven air or bakeware surfaces. Sugar can thoroughly burn and become rather bitter and hard at 200°C. High water content can mitigate this to some degree.

  • Anything with small aromatics (eg herbs, fine diced onions, garlic) in exposed spots. Especially garlic - it burns to something very, very unpalatable.

  • Anything exposed with already low water content - at 200°C, once you bake something dry, there is not much time before you start charring or hardening it.

  • Anything covered in oils or marinades that take badly to high heat (eg unrefined olive oils).

rackandboneman
  • 15,249
  • 3
  • 37
  • 54