Questions tagged [isolation-level]

Isolation level defines what data an SQL transaction can view or access while other transactions work with the same data.

ACID standard defines 4 isolation levels - read uncommitted, read committed, repeatable read and serializable. The higher the isolation level is, the more is guaranteed that another transaction can't break yours, but the lower amount of concurrency the database can handle. MySQL and MSSQL support all isolation levels, while PostgreSQL and Oracle support only the 2 most common, read committed and serializable

Read uncommitted means that the transaction works with the latest data available. In this isolation level it's possible that a transaction reads data that is not yet committed and possibly will be rolled back and never exist.

Read committed is the most basic isolation level, which ensures that transactions only read data that is already saved. It is possible however for another transaction to modify the data after the first transaction has read it but before it has modified it.

Repeatable read ensures that any subsequent read of the data will return the same result as the first read, therefore eliminating the race condition described above.

Serializable ensures that transactions are run in such a way that the result is the same as they were run in sequence, not in parallel.

725 questions
0
votes
1 answer

Why does a transaction under Snapshot Isolation Level take S and IX locks?

I'm investigating a deadlock and I see in deadlock xml file from profiler that process process5332cf8 runs transaction under Snapshot isolation level (isolationlevel="snapshot (5)"). But somehow it holds IX lock on a page and wants to take another…
Artur Udod
  • 4,465
  • 1
  • 29
  • 58
0
votes
0 answers

SQL Server: READ COMMITTED and UPDLOCK hint

I am writing a stored procedure that will use by application that function is booking. And it can happen concurrent booking. To handle that, which approach will be suitable? I am trying to use isolation level "READ COMMITTED" & "UPDLOCK" hint to…
RedsDevils
  • 1,413
  • 9
  • 26
  • 47
0
votes
3 answers

SQL Server Isolation Levels - Repeatable Read

I'm having problems getting my head round why this is happening. Pretty sure I understand the theory, but something else must be going on that I don't see. Table A has the following schema: ID [Primary Key] Name Type [Foreign Key] SprocA sets…
Duncan
  • 10,218
  • 14
  • 64
  • 96
0
votes
0 answers

transactional poller not working with mssqlerver

i have a transactional poller (spring 3.1.2 and spring-integration 2.2.3) to ensure that messages will be redelivered if the transaction is rolled back by an exception
cproinger
  • 2,258
  • 1
  • 17
  • 33
0
votes
1 answer

Derby doesn't allow isolation level to be set at TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE for concurrent access

I'm using Derby database and trying to create DB objects concurrently. As we all know that the default isolation level in it is TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED. But I don't want to allow even phantom reads with the DB and hence, I want to set the…
0
votes
2 answers

PHP Script Execution and Static Variable Isolation

I have a fairly basic PHP question that I don't seem to be able to find an answer to. When a user visits a website that executes a PHP script, is that script run in isolation from all other running instances of the same script? For example, if I…
Harry Muscle
  • 2,247
  • 4
  • 38
  • 62
0
votes
2 answers

T-SQL isolation when multiple update

I need to update a few entries with different values and make 1 query per update. Before I do, I check every initial values to make sure the entry can be updated. I'm not even sure this could happen but I would like to avoid having those entries…
Rachid
  • 393
  • 1
  • 3
  • 14
0
votes
1 answer

dining philosophers, innodb, select for update

Applying the dining philosophers problem to innodb, and the use of select for update: 1) a table with 100,000 forks, represented by an innodb table with its single primary key (the fork) 2) the grab of forks is a select for update that specifies…
Andy Nuss
  • 745
  • 1
  • 7
  • 20
0
votes
0 answers

SQL Server IsolationLevel.ReadUncomitted dangers

I'm currently doing the following in a ReadUncommitted transaction on mulitple thread, in a an old system: Each thread get a unique set of data to work on. There are never duplicates across these threads. The threads gather data from a bunch of…
Christian Mikkelsen
  • 1,661
  • 2
  • 19
  • 44
0
votes
1 answer

Read uncommitted when using Rob Conery's Massive

Is there a way to do a read uncommitted when using Rob Conery's Massive without writing your own query? It is for a site that is mostly read-only. A CMS type of a site.
eiu165
  • 6,101
  • 10
  • 41
  • 59
0
votes
1 answer

optimal isolation level for specific applications

Trying to understand isolation levels better - using entity framework and sql server What would be the recommended isolation level for the following scenario - An online booking system say for flight tickets or event tickets Scenario - Let us…
0
votes
0 answers

Accessing detached .mdf database over TCP/IP

My problem is exactly as described in title, but I am not familiar with MS Access, and I'd like to avoid interacting with it at any cost. I have stumbled upon a point of sale (POS) system, which is built on MS Access. MSAccess Runtime 2003, to be…
Kai
  • 424
  • 5
  • 16
0
votes
0 answers

Error trying to change SQL Server CE transaction isolation level

I want to change the transaction isolation level of a connection to SQL Server CE (3.5) according to the documentation : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms171885(v=SQL.105).aspx So I send the following statement: SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION…
Guillaume
  • 12,824
  • 3
  • 40
  • 48
0
votes
1 answer

Setting the custom isolation levels for DataSourceTransactionManager

How to enable custom isolation levels for the DataSourceTransactionManager? I have the following in my spring configuration file.
0
votes
1 answer

Transaction isolation level on an oledb-connection

I have an oledb-connection from clickview to a sql2005-server and I would like this connection to use transaction isolation level of read uncommitted. My seconde choice would be to set it on the user. How can I accomplish this?
Frederik
  • 2,178
  • 4
  • 20
  • 20