Questions tagged [idisposable]

IDisposable is an interface within the Microsoft .NET Framework's Base Class Library (BCL). It is intended to provide a generic, deterministic method of releasing unmanaged resources within .NET application code.

Purpose

IDisposable is an interface within the Microsoft .NET Framework's Base Class Library (BCL). It is intended to provide a generic, deterministic method of releasing unmanaged resources within .NET application code.

Unmanaged Resources

A managed resource is any object in memory that, in its entirety, can be monitored and released by the .NET garbage collector when they are no longer needed. The vast majority of types available within the .NET libraries (as well as user-defined types) represent managed resources. Because these are managed resources, it is not necessary to release the memory that these objects require; once they are no longer in use, the .NET garbage collector will periodically "collect" these objects and free this memory for other uses.

An unmanaged resource is any resource (typically something existing outside of the application runtime, such as a file handle or database connection) which is not--and cannot be--monitored and released by the .NET runtime garbage collector. Typical examples of unmanaged resources are network connections, file handles, and Windows GDI graphics handles. All of these resources, while represented in .NET code by a traditional object, are outside of the reach of the .NET garbage collector, as the procedure for obtaining and releasing such resources are specific to the type of resource, and all require calls into unmanaged code.

IDisposable

IDisposable is an interface within the BCL that defines a single parameterless, non-returning function called Dispose. A type that implements this interface indicates to the developer that, at some level of encapsulation, this type utilizes an unmanaged resource of some kind. In this case, the developer is required to call Dispose on the instance once it is no longer needed. The underlying type's implementation of Dispose should then perform whatever actions are necessary to release the resource, including calling unmanaged code.

Use Cases

There are two* (by design) cases in which a type should implement IDisposable:

  1. The type interacts directly with an unmanaged resource (it calls an unmanaged or external function to acquire a resource, and another unmanaged or external function to release it).
  2. The type makes use of an unmanaged resource indirectly through other types that implement IDisposable. In other words, the type makes use of an unmanaged resource that is not managed by another instance and exists beyond the lifetime of a single function call.

In the first case, the use is obvious: the type makes use of the resource directly, so it must acquire and release the resource directly. In the second case, the type makes use of other IDisposable types and must be told when it is safe to call Dispose on those resources.

*A type may also implement IDisposable in order to take advantage of the using language constructs within VB.NET and C#, but this choice is generally made for aesthetic or idiomatic reasons, not out of technical applicability, so those cases fall outside the scope of this article.

Implementation

Depending on the reason that a type implements the IDisposable interface, the implementation may vary slightly. There are, in general, two forms of implementation of IDisposable:

  1. Simple, strict implementation of the interface (a single Dispose function)
  2. Finalizer-compatible implementation (two versions of Dispose)

Simple

If the type falls into the second use-case outlined above (indirect use of an unmanaged resource purely by encapsulation), then the first implementation should be used. An example appears below:

public class WidgetFile : IDisposable
{
    private FileStream fileStream;

    public WidgetFile(string fileName)
    {
        fileStream = new FileStream(fileName, FileMode.Open);
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        fileStream.Dispose();
    }
}

In this case, the WidgetFile encapsulates an IDisposable type, System.IO.FileStream. Since the type (and its parent type(s)) only indirectly interact with an unmanaged resource, the simple implementation is both adequate and preferred.

Finalizer-Based

If, however, the type (or one of its parent types) interacts directly with an unmanaged resource, then a more defensive, finalizer-based approach is required:

[DllImport("Widget.dll")]
private static extern IntPtr GetGadgetHandle(string fileName);
[DllImport("Widget.dll")]
private static extern void ReleaseGadgetHandle(IntPtr handle);

public class SuperWidgetFile : IDisposable
{
    private IntPtr handle;
    private WidgetFile file;

    public SuperWidgetFile(string fileName)
    {
        handle = GetGadgetHandle(fileName);
        file = new WidgetFile(fileName);
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        Dispose(true);
    }

    ~SuperWidgetFile()
    {
        Dispose(false);
    }

    protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if(disposing)
        {
            file.Dispose();
            GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
        }

        if(handle != IntPtr.Zero)
        {
            ReleaseGadgetHandle(handle);
            handle = IntPtr.Zero;
        }
    }
}

This implementation is obviously more complex than the simple, strict interface implementation. This is because, while a conscientious developer will always call Dispose on an instance of an IDisposable type when it is no longer needed, mistakes do happen and there is the possibility that the object may be unused but not have Dispose called. In this case, the instance itself (since it is a managed resource) will be collected by the garbage collector, while the unmanaged resource it refers to will never be released explicitly.

However, the garbage collector provides the ability to write code that executes before an object is collected and destroyed, called a "finalizer". The function defined as ~SuperWidgetFile() is the finalizer for the SuperWidgetFile type.

When using this approach, the implementing class must:

  1. Provide a protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing) function
  2. Implement the interface and provide a Dispose() function, which calls Dispose(true)
  3. Create a finalizer which calls Dispose(false)

The boolean disposing parameter is designed to designate the source of the function call. If it came from an explicit disposal (the desired path), then it should evaluate to true. If it came from the finalizer, then it should evaluate to false. This is because, as we have done, all IDisposable types that interact with unmanaged resources directly must use the finalizer approach, and these objects may have been collected already. Because of this, the type should only perform the release of its own unmanaged resources within the finalizer.

If the object is disposed explicitly (disposing == true), the type calls GC.SuppressFinalize(this), which tells the garbage collector that this object's finalizer does not need to be called when it is collected.

Common Questions

Q: Are IDisposable types "special"? Does the .NET runtime or garbage collector treat them differently by automatically calling Dispose, collecting them early, etc.?

A: NO. Fundamentally, IDiposable is just an interface, no different from any other interface defined in the .NET libraries or in user code. At runtime, objects implementing IDisposable follow exactly the same rules for collection as all other objects. The only "special treatment" afforded IDisposable types exist at the language level, where language shorthand allow for greater ease in remembering to call Dispose, such as within the using constructs in VB.NET and C#. Again, these are language features only. They do not have any impact on runtime behavior.

Q: Do I always need to call Dispose?

A: YES. While you may have personal knowledge of a particular type and what it actually does when Dispose is called, there should be a very clear, well-defined, and unavoidable reason to avoid calling Dispose when an object is no longer in use. The absolute easiest method of ensuring that you properly dispose of your disposable objects is to enclose them in using blocks:

using(SuperWidgetFile file = new SuperWidgetFile(@"C:\widget.wgt"))
{
    // widget code
}

However, this construct only works when the lifetime of the instance begins and ends within a single function call; in other cases, you will have to ensure that you call Dispose explicitly.

1420 questions
29
votes
1 answer

Dependency Injection and IDisposable

I'm a little bit confused about Dispose() methods in IDisposable implementations with Autofac usage Say I have a certain depth to my objects: Controller depends on IManager; Manager depends on IRepository; Repository depends on ISession; ISession…
Igorek
  • 15,716
  • 3
  • 54
  • 92
29
votes
11 answers

Do I need to call Dispose() on managed objects?

I can't believe I'm still confused about this but, any way, lets finally nail it: I have a class that overrides OnPaint to do some drawing. To speed things up, I create the pens, brushes etc before hand, in the constructor, so that OnPaint does not…
Jules
  • 4,319
  • 3
  • 44
  • 72
29
votes
3 answers

Determining if IDisposable should extend an interface or be implemented on a class implementing said interface

How can I determine if I should extend one of my interfaces with IDisposable or implement IDisposable on a class that implements my interface? I have an interface that does not need to dispose of any external resources, except for one particular…
Peter Rilling
  • 323
  • 3
  • 7
29
votes
7 answers

Am I implementing IDisposable correctly?

This class uses a StreamWriter and therefore implements IDisposable. public class Foo : IDisposable { private StreamWriter _Writer; public Foo (String path) { // here happens something along the lines of: FileStream…
mafu
  • 31,798
  • 42
  • 154
  • 247
28
votes
1 answer

C# Linq-to-Sql - Should DataContext be disposed using IDisposable

I have several methods that deal with DB and all of them start by calling FaierDbDataContext db = new FaierDbDataContext(); Since the Linq2Sql DataContext object implements IDisposable, should this be used with "using"? using (FaierDbDataContext db…
Kornelije Petak
  • 9,412
  • 15
  • 68
  • 96
28
votes
3 answers

What is the difference between managed and native resources when disposing? (.NET)

I was reading the MSDN article about how to implement IDisposable and I am uncertain about the difference between managed and native resources cited in the article. I have a class that must dispose 2 of its fields when it is disposed. Should I treat…
Jader Dias
  • 88,211
  • 155
  • 421
  • 625
28
votes
2 answers

Why CancellationTokenRegistration exists and why does it implement IDisposable

I've been seeing code that uses Cancellation.Register with a using clause on the CancellationTokenRegistration result: using (CancellationTokenRegistration ctr = token.Register(() => wc.CancelAsync())) { await wc.DownloadStringAsync(new…
i3arnon
  • 113,022
  • 33
  • 324
  • 344
27
votes
6 answers

Getting rid of nested using(...) statements

Sometimes I need to use several disposable objects within a function. Most common case is having StreamReader and StreamWriter but sometimes it's even more than this. Nested using statements quickly add up and look ugly. To remedy this I've created…
Ghostrider
  • 7,545
  • 7
  • 30
  • 44
27
votes
5 answers

Any issue with nesting "using" statements in c#?

I recently downloaded Visual Studio 2013 and I ran the Code Analysis on a project I'm working on. Its thrown up a couple of issues that I'm working through but one in particular is about how I am using the "using" IDisposable statement. Here's an…
Rob
  • 6,819
  • 17
  • 71
  • 131
26
votes
5 answers

Best practice for reusing SqlConnection

I've come from Java experience and am trying to start with C#. I've read SqlConnection SqlCommand SqlDataReader IDisposable and I can understand that the best practice to connecting to a DB is wrapping SqlConnection, SqlCommand and SqlDataReader in…
Hikari
  • 3,797
  • 12
  • 47
  • 77
25
votes
1 answer

Ninject doesn't call Dispose on objects when out of scope

I was surprised to find that at least one of my objects created by Ninject is not disposed of at the end of the request, when it has been defined to be InRequestScope Here's the object I'm trying to dispose: Interface: public interface IDataContext…
Cynthia
  • 2,100
  • 5
  • 34
  • 48
25
votes
7 answers

How to handle exception thrown from Dispose?

Recently, I was researching some tricky bugs about object not disposed. I found some pattern in code. It is reported that some m_foo is not disposed, while it seems all instances of SomeClass has been disposed. public class SomeClass: IDisposable { …
Morgan Cheng
  • 73,950
  • 66
  • 171
  • 230
24
votes
2 answers

How do I dispose my filestream when implementing a file download in ASP.NET?

I have a class DocumentGenerator which wraps a MemoryStream. So I have implemented IDisposable on the class. I can't see how/where I can possibly dispose it though. This is my current code, which performs a file download in MVC: using…
fearofawhackplanet
  • 52,166
  • 53
  • 160
  • 253
23
votes
4 answers

How write several using instructions?

Possible Duplicate: using statement with multiple variables I have several disposable object to manage. The CA2000 rule ask me to dispose all my object before exiting the scope. I don't like to use the .Dispose() method if I can use the using…
Bastien Vandamme
  • 17,659
  • 30
  • 118
  • 200
23
votes
3 answers

Determine managed vs unmanaged resources

There are lots of questions about managed vs unmanaged resources. I understand the basic definition of the two. However, I have a hard time knowing when a resource or object is managed or unmanaged. When I think of unmanaged resources I tend to…
galford13x
  • 2,483
  • 4
  • 30
  • 39