I need to write a program for equivalence classes and get this outputs...
(equiv '((a b) (a c) (d e) (e f) (c g) (g h)))
=> ((a b c g h) (d e f))
(equiv '((a b) (c d) (e f) (f g) (a e)))
=> ((a b e f g) (c d))
Basically, A set is a list in…
Suppose I have:
int a;
int b;
Are the variables a and b name equivalent (more specifically, since primitive types don't have type names, can they be considered name equivalent)?
Thanks.
So I was asked whether these 3 type expressions where equivalent in Haskell:
τ1 = (a -> a) -> (a -> a -> a)
τ2 = a -> a -> ((a -> a) -> a)
τ3 = a -> a -> (a -> (a -> a))
if I take away the parenthesis I'm left with this
τ1 = (a -> a) -> a -> a ->…
The Guava JavaDocs for Sets.SetView.union() (as well as intersection(), difference(), and symmetricDifference()) mention "equivalence relations":
Results are undefined if set1 and set2 are sets based on different equivalence relations (as HashSet,…
I was scanning some stylesheets when I noticed one which used a linear-gradient with rgba() color-stops in which the rgba numbers used multiple instances of 0 instead of just a single 0:
background-image:linear-gradient(to top left,…
Reading this answer it seems, that if __eq__ is defined in custom class, __hash__ needs to be defined as well. This is understandable.
However it is not clear, why - effectively - __eq__ should be same as self.__hash__()==other.__hash__
Imagining a…
I am working on a research project where I want to determine equivalence of two distributions. I am currently using the Mann-Whitney Test for Equivalence and the code I am running (below) was provided with the book Testing Statistical Hypotheses of…
Alright so, I'm embedding python 3.3 into a c++ application. I'm looking to dynamically create a python class on the c++ side exactly like if I was doing the following in python:
my_type = type("MyType", (object,), dict())
I know I could always…
EDIT: Based on everyone's feedback, the original version of this question is more design-related, not standards-related. Making more SO-friendly.
Original:
Should a JS primitive be considered "equivalent" to an object-wrapped version of that…
I am generating a big list of factors with different levels, and I want to be able to detect when two of them define the same partition. For example, I want to detect all of the following as equivalent to each other:
x1 <- factor(c("a", "a", "b",…
I have this function below.
It recieves a string and a key made out of another string.
The function takes the inputs and adds on the date to make the exact same key to validate.
public bool isSecureKeyCorrect(string inputs,string thatKey)
{
…
I am very new to python, as you will be able to tell.
If I have a list:
a = [1,2,3,2,1]
This evaluates to true:
a == a[::-1]
...but this evaluates to false:
a == a.reverse()
Why is that the case?
I have a class whose instances are to be distinguished by an identity that is different from the data values they carry. In my code, I intend to use == to mean two instances are equivalent regarding their data, and is to mean two variables refer to…
Imagine you have a list of words:
['cat', 'ant', 'bro', 'gro']
Using some arbitrary mapping that we construct ourselves {'c'=>'a', 'a'=>'n', 't'=>'t' }, we can map 'cat' to 'ant', and similarly we can find some arbitrary mapping to convert 'bro' to…
I have two container.Map objects, with identical keys and values. Is there a Matlab function, that is going to return true in the following scenario:
>> m1 = containers.Map('hi', 'ho');
>> m2 = containers.Map('hi', 'ho');
>> m1 == m2
ans =
0