Questions tagged [copy-elision]

Copy elision refers to an exception to the as-if rule allowing to omit copies

Copy Elision is an exception to the as-if rule governing the behavior of C++ programs.

Return-value-optimization is copy-ellision applied to value-returns.

12.8 Copying and moving class objects [class.copy]

31 When certain criteria are met, an implementation is allowed to omit the copy/move construction of a class object, even if the constructor selected for the copy/move operation and/or the destructor for the object have side effects. In such cases, the implementation treats the source and target of the omitted copy/move operation as simply two different ways of referring to the same object, and the destruction of that object occurs at the later of the times when the two objects would have been destroyed without the optimization.123
This elision of copy/move operations, called copy elision, is permitted in the following circumstances (which may be combined to eliminate multiple copies):

  • in a return statement in a function with a class return type, when the expression is the name of a non-volatile automatic object (other than a function or catch-clause parameter) with the same cv-unqualified type as the function return type, the copy/move operation can be omitted by constructing the automatic object directly into the function’s return value
  • in a throw-expression, when the operand is the name of a non-volatile automatic object (other than a function or catch-clause parameter) whose scope does not extend beyond the end of the innermost enclosing try-block (if there is one), the copy/move operation from the operand to the exception object (15.1) can be omitted by constructing the automatic object directly into the exception object
  • when a temporary class object that has not been bound to a reference (12.2) would be copied/moved to a class object with the same cv-unqualified type, the copy/move operation can be omitted by constructing the temporary object directly into the target of the omitted copy/move
  • when the exception-declaration of an exception handler (Clause 15) declares an object of the same type (except for cv-qualification) as the exception object (15.1), the copy operation can be omitted by treating the exception-declaration as an alias for the exception object if the meaning of the program will be unchanged except for the execution of constructors and destructors for the object declared by the exception-declaration.
272 questions
0
votes
2 answers

Why move assignment in my class wasn't called?

Consider this code: #include #include #include using namespace std; struct BigInteger { vector arr; BigInteger() { cout << "default constructor" << endl; …
Learpcs
  • 282
  • 3
  • 10
0
votes
1 answer

How to disable copy elision for constructors with std::source_location?

I am trying to add instrumentation to a widely used template class in my product. I am currently on VS 2019 (16.10.4) with /std:c++17. The new feature of std::source_location is a great addition for the kind of task I am interested in solving. …
Rahul Bhobe
  • 4,165
  • 4
  • 17
  • 32
0
votes
0 answers

How to properly copy into an already initialized object variable

#include class MyArray { public: MyArray(int* array, int size) { this->size = size; this->array = new int[size]; for(int i = 0; i < size; i++) { this->array[i] = array[i]; …
0
votes
2 answers

C++ Why does returning rvalue reference change caller's behavior when function signature does not return rvalue reference?

I've come across some behavior I cannot wrap my head around regarding rvalue return. Let's say we have the following structs: struct Bar { int a; Bar() : a(1) { std::cout << "Default Constructed" << std::endl; } …
UncleBen
  • 82
  • 7
0
votes
1 answer

why is temporary object's address same with object's address which has the temporary object in C++

I read some book about C++ , and I can't understand some points in here. temporary object is born cause returning of function and this temporary object will be stored at some object. , so I have tried many time code in below so result of this like…
user15249387
0
votes
0 answers

Why can copy elision not optimise all copy operations?

I read about copy elision and how it can fasten up Programms by giving possibilities to write code more straight foreword without thinking about references of variables. In a small example I tried to find the limits of this technique. #include…
0
votes
1 answer

Creating a new class object and move semantics

Having this simple class: #include class B { public: //default constructor B(const char* str = "\0") { std::cout << "Constructor called\n"; } //copy constructor B(const B& b) { std::cout <<…
Derek81
  • 145
  • 9
0
votes
1 answer

push_back copy objects even for temps although stating otherwise in it's definition?

one of push_back definition is push_back(const value_type& __x) so Having my_vector2.push_back( obj ); will result in passing object obj by reference( No copy during passing object) still it call the copy constructor in the body of push_back…
KMG
  • 1,433
  • 1
  • 8
  • 19
0
votes
1 answer

Tour of C++ copy elision in Section 4.2.3

I'm reading Section 4.2.3 Initializing Containers, Tour of C++ Second Edition. It says: Vector read(istream& is) { Vector v; for (double d; is>>d;) v.push_back(d); return v; } ... The way to provide Vector with a move…
Jay Lee
  • 1,684
  • 1
  • 15
  • 27
0
votes
1 answer

Copy Elision in visual 2019

I was trying to test a small code to check if my compiler (under Visual Studio 2019) does copy elision, as it is no more optional for some cases under C++17. So I tried the code below : #include #include using namespace…
Blood-HaZaRd
  • 2,049
  • 2
  • 20
  • 43
0
votes
0 answers

Why doesn't any constructor get called?

class X { public: X() {} X(const X&) { std::cou << "copy constructor"; } X(X&&) { std::cout << "move constructor"; } }; X func() { return X(); } int main() { X x(func()); // nothing is printed } I think…
0
votes
2 answers

Is a move constructor/assignment needed for RVO to kick in in C++11?

For example: In accepted answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/14623480/1423254, Does copy elision and RVO would still work for classes without move constructors? Yes, RVO still kicks in. Actually, the compiler is expected to pick: RVO (if…
Lukas Salich
  • 959
  • 2
  • 12
  • 30
0
votes
1 answer

C++ (function) template that return its unique argument without copying it for certain types

I have a function value(x) which is overloaded for many types such that: double value(double x) { return x; } double value(MyType x) { return x.value(); } SomeContainer value(SomeContainer x) { return x; } SomeContainer
0
votes
1 answer

Copy elision, std::move, and chained function calls

I've been investigating how copy elision behaves when it is not directly assigned to an lvalue and perhaps chained or used down the road, but haven't found any concrete answers. For starters, I understand that NRVO occurs in the following example,…
jeanluc
  • 1,608
  • 1
  • 14
  • 28
0
votes
2 answers

Why is copy elision an exception to the as-if rule?

Why does the standard allow my compiler to apply copy elision even when it involves visible side effects, thus breaks the as-if rule? It is somehow plausible'ish for me when one has guaranteed copy elision, because the actual functionality for…
nnolte
  • 1,628
  • 11
  • 25